you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Tom_Bombadil[S] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

Two years ago I would have agreed with you.

I'm at environmentalist.

For decades I was completely fooled by the global warming hoax.

Bro. Global Warming is a hoax. Demonstrably.

It's every bit as staged as Covid is.

Fake AF. However, we all know plenty of people who are scared shitless of the scamdemic theater on tv.

Similarly, you won't be able to shake the global warming "spell" if you don't want to recognize the truth.

We've been frightened with apocalyptic predictions that the world will end in ten years for over 30 years. Nothing has changed. Actually, the weather is cooler.

Let me know if your interested in evidence that substantiates my position.

I won't waste your time if you're not ready.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

Maybe regionally this differs. In Germany and Poland droughts even into the deep ground (up to 2m!) are facts which colleagues of mine surveyed themselves, so i know this secondhand.

Then there are the levels of our bigger rivers which seemingly know only two options in the last 20 years: Either low / very low levels or massive floods like it happened with Elbe two times in the last twenty years (and some smaller rivers in many more examples, like in Leipzig). The called the first one century-flood which obviously in this millennium isn't true anymore.

Elbe had a level of almost always 180 cm in a certain city up to 2001. Since 2006 it has seldomly over 85cm which is a loss of so much water that channels, nearby rivers and river Elbe itself in many parts aren't usable for freight boats in 90 % of the year anymore. In contrast the bigger flood had a level of over 700cm (!) .

Till the year 2000 water problems were mostly unknown in Germany because there are so many rivers. So something definitely changed here.

But even if not the droughts there is mass insect extinction because of the over-exhaustive use of way too much and many broadband-pesticides. (Which will make problems with the pollination of many crops and damage all living beings long-term because these insects are the lower ends of almost all food-chains on land.)

And ground erosion which narrows (or even completely inhibits) the cultivation of classical, well-known crops stay as problems. Which i myself surveyed in our region, so you can't deny this argument at least for a approximately 100-km radius around my home-city for which i know all these maps and plans. We had the best soils in whole Germany nearby for extensive cultivation of potatoes e.g. with grades very near to 100 that now sunk regionally to under 85. Which is why the best soils in Germany now are in Baden-Würtemberg and Bayern. This is an epochal change.

We even have woods now with 70 % dead and another 10 % severly ill trees which supports all this.

More examples i studied deeply:

Spain will most likely be desertified in the next 20 years in many, many regions. In near future Andalusia (as the most extreme example) will more and more become like Morocco, so like Sahara. Nearly 80% of imported German vegetables come from this region. You see i don't even need to start on forest fires in Spain:

In Russia near Moscow turf soil was burning for many weeks in summer because of extensive droughts and forest fires. For three consecutive years now. Because ground that usually was permafrost for most parts of the year now thaws for more and more periods of a year.

These are real man-made measurable problems and all three put together are definitely no hoax. Maybe they just aren't in your field of view but they definitely are in mine.

In my region, in Poland, Spain and Russia calling this a hoax is simply a bad joke. Because every geodetic here and nearby knows better. This is our job.

If you wanna pull out your proofs that contradict this, i suppose you should now. Because climate is not only about temperature as i'm sure you won't oppose.

If you wanna have some real fun lets talk about water reserves or forest fires in California or Greenland as a whole. I love all these pictures.

We also could talk about middle-east and Sahara itself where well after well goes dry because even harvesting deep level water and aquifers becomes more of a problem.

Or we could talk about these nice videos on youtube where US citizen near fracking areas light the gas that comes out of their water-taps. Or the mini-earthquakes supposedly caused by this.

Or the regions in Canada that look like the moon surface because of oil-sand harvesting.

Or Antarctica.

Or glaciers in the Alps. Whole holiday areas for skiing there only can work because of extensive usage of snow-cannons. Otherwise nobody would go there anymore which is a new level of insanity, isn't it?

I could go on. But i think all this is enough for you to disprove at this point in time.

To uphold your thesis that climate- (rather negative earth-) change is a hoax.

[–]JasonCarswell 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

I agree mankind is fucking up the Earth all over, via monocrops, resource mismanagement, dried aquifers, terrible toxicity, and of course pollution, etc.

That doesn't make the "climate change" hysteria true - it just steals the thunder of those REAL problems AND it adds a tax to fuck the poorest people and poorest nations first and hardest.

We don't need centralized "solutions". We need ground up systemic reforms/revolutions and "they" will never offer that.

[–]peckerpolisher 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

i wish somebody would use some of that fancy physics magic to fix this problem:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AkSXB-lRAp0