you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]JohnRaymond[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (8 children)

40 year time limit? This 40 year limit is your common sense number. Yes, 40 years makes sense on a natural level... But I go by Catholic Church. You can't find this number

No time limit exists. Btw, Our Lady of LaSallette said ROME WILL LOSE THE FAITH. How more in your face can you get?? And! Some clergy in Catholic Church try to suppress these dire warnings. That's extra proof that they are worthy if belief

The following is my opinion, and could be wrong. old testament Jews were punished for 70 years I believe... In my opinion, I think we are living out some of what old testament Jews went thru. My opinion, from maccabean uprising YouTube channel.

[–]JohnRaymond[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

LAST. Saints have talked about possibility of Catholic Church going down to extremely small numbers. Under 100 I believe, maybe less. God loves Catholic Church and is very jealous God.

Your first line says IMPLIES. the correct words are.. You inferred it. And you did so in error.

You can't site one Catholic teaching I am rejecting

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Okay, suppose the Novus Ordo is the abomination of desolation. We are past the 1290 days of Daniel.

[–]JohnRaymond[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Now! We aren't to interpret Bible like this!

Edit.. Only Catholic Church can interpret Bible. I believe end times is particularly difficult?

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

Rome CAN lose the faith. I believe it is in the book of the apocalypse. I think Francis is the false prophet.

What the Catholic Church cannot do is contradict dogma. I think 1958 sedes were correct mostly but too early. The masons took over most of the Church but not the papacy. That is why they resigned Benedict to install the false prophet of Fatima.

[–]JohnRaymond[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Ratzinger was a decades long apostate. What dogma does sedevacantism contradict? Sedevacantism explains how papacy was Not taken over. Papacy remains pure.
Have you ever read Pope Paul IV on this? He anticipated this in 16th century

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

You have to read pre Vatican II theology manuals and the old Catholic encyclopedia. Indefectibility is attached to the pope. He is the reason the see of Rome cannot defect. The only way the identity of the pope is not a dogmatic fact is when there are two or more possible popes like from 2013-2022. We have to make all the numbers given to us by scripture as symbolic much like Protestants do when they tell about a great apostasy. With Benevacantism everything fits. The Church founded on the pope cannot defect but the Church founded on an antipope can . The abomination of desolation is going to come very soon, then Christ will return to destroy the antichrist.

[–]JohnRaymond[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

These false popes NEVER became popes. Pope Paul IV , perennial Catholic teaching, A Non Catholic can't become pope.

Ratz was wicked apostate, go to novusordowatch , False popes, Ratzinger for his rap sheet. Utter traitor

[–]JohnRaymond[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I can provide support on request. So I'm not judging any pope