you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]JohnRaymond[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Ratzinger was a decades long apostate. What dogma does sedevacantism contradict? Sedevacantism explains how papacy was Not taken over. Papacy remains pure.
Have you ever read Pope Paul IV on this? He anticipated this in 16th century

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

You have to read pre Vatican II theology manuals and the old Catholic encyclopedia. Indefectibility is attached to the pope. He is the reason the see of Rome cannot defect. The only way the identity of the pope is not a dogmatic fact is when there are two or more possible popes like from 2013-2022. We have to make all the numbers given to us by scripture as symbolic much like Protestants do when they tell about a great apostasy. With Benevacantism everything fits. The Church founded on the pope cannot defect but the Church founded on an antipope can . The abomination of desolation is going to come very soon, then Christ will return to destroy the antichrist.

[–]JohnRaymond[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

These false popes NEVER became popes. Pope Paul IV , perennial Catholic teaching, A Non Catholic can't become pope.

Ratz was wicked apostate, go to novusordowatch , False popes, Ratzinger for his rap sheet. Utter traitor

[–]JohnRaymond[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I can provide support on request. So I'm not judging any pope