use the following search parameters to narrow your results:
e.g. subreddit:pics site:imgur.com dog
subreddit:pics site:imgur.com dog
advanced search: by author, sub...
~5 users here now
Christianity
Was Paul a Christ mythicist? Forgery detected in 1 Corinthians indicates so!
submitted 1 year ago * by Vulptex from self.Christianity
view the rest of the comments →
[–]iamonlyoneman 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - 1 year ago (4 children)
Better scholars than either of us have explained it. https://biblehub.com/commentaries/jeremiah/7-22.htm
It's not hard to grasp but you have to be willing to grasp it.
You can't prove the unicorn didn't exist, nor any other negative proof.
KJV is the superior translation for English speakers. Cope.
[–]Vulptex[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - 1 year ago (3 children)
All of those explanations are really straining to explain away the contradiction. I'll admit I'm no scholar myself, but those are also theologians and not serious scholars.
"Unicorn" in the days of the KJV meant an animal with one horn. In this case, most likely a kind of ox.
You keep insisting that the KJV is superior, but you have zero evidence. You're literally making the most circular argument possible: "it's superior because it's superior".
[–]iamonlyoneman 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - 1 year ago (2 children)
It's not a contradiction
It's not up to me to explain things that have been explained at excruciating length by others already, to people who wouldn't understand.
[–]Vulptex[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - 1 year ago (1 child)
You keep saying it's been solidly established, but you never back up your claims more than a tiny bit. Seems like you just don't have any real counterpoints.
[–]iamonlyoneman 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - 1 year ago (0 children)
k
view the rest of the comments →
[–]iamonlyoneman 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - (4 children)
[–]Vulptex[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - (3 children)
[–]iamonlyoneman 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - (2 children)
[–]Vulptex[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - (1 child)
[–]iamonlyoneman 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - (0 children)