Not to gang up on you for a suggestion, but IMO as blackpilling as any moid conservative drivel. He's a sociologist, a word salad tosser with no more credibility that some Jordan Peterson. There are plenty female patriarchy justifiers in that area, like Paglia or Butler, and they all demonstrate what's fucked about humanitarian academia.

I picked traditionsofconflict because moid-anthropologist who writes it makes a point to show how undeniably shit the whole ordeal is to women and how anthropoligists who ignore this plight suck and how hippy-types glamorizing those polygamous peaceful foraging days as egalitarian are naive. A woman speaking the same would not have a career unfortunately.

I picked "sexual coersion in primates..." because it is a collection of articles by various biologists, basically. Edited by dudes who wrote "Demonic male", which I wouldn't recommend if not for the lack of material, they suggest females should wate their time on making existing dudes better, as can be expecte from moids.

What does Goldberg bring to the table, in your opinion?