What should the limits be on sub moderators?
submitted 1 year ago * by magnora7 from (self.AskSaidIt)
view the rest of the comments →
[–]OmegaUser296 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun - 1 year ago (3 children)
Yeah above 50 would be overboard.
[–]JasonCarswell 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - 1 year ago (2 children)
Maybe if half of them were empty.
[–]OmegaUser296 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - 1 year ago (1 child)
Okay using yo as an example (sorry) Most of them would be empty without you falsely filling them, without your posts most of your subs would be empty or near it.
[–]JasonCarswell 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun - 1 year ago (0 children)
Me "falsely" filling them is such a loaded straw man.
What if someone, not me, were to set up a bunch of subs and each of those had a YouTube channel with a bot posting every new video to its corresponding sub. And no one else posted there. Does that count as "falsely filling"? And if someone, not me, posted one more post in them would that validate that sub for you.
Your argument is lacking any rational substance.
use the following search parameters to narrow your results:
e.g. sub:pics site:imgur.com dog
sub:pics site:imgur.com dog
advanced search: by author, sub...
~2 users here now
Ask the community of saidit a question!