What should the limits be on sub moderators?
submitted 4 years ago * by magnora7 from (self.AskSaidIt)
view the rest of the comments →
[–]bobbobbybob 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun - 4 years ago (2 children)
so we need a superset of moderator moderators.
Hmm.
Can we leverage AI to do it, or will humans have to be involved?
[–]JasonCarswell 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun - 4 years ago (0 children)
There's no need for hierarchy.
We need a public forum for all the drama.
Someone could make /s/SaidtItConflicts to be our open crowd-sourced Colosseum and/or Senate Floor and/or Judicial Tribunal.
(The 3/tri in tribunal would be magora7, d3rr, and public opinion.)
[–]Yhvr 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun - 4 years ago (0 children)
No AI is perfect. Just keep that in mind. We can train AI to be close to perfect, but perfect? No.
use the following search parameters to narrow your results:
e.g. sub:pics site:imgur.com dog
sub:pics site:imgur.com dog
advanced search: by author, sub...
~8 users here now
Ask the community of saidit a question!
view the rest of the comments →
[–]bobbobbybob 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun - (2 children)
[–]JasonCarswell 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun - (0 children)
[–]Yhvr 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun - (0 children)