Its the parents' responsability, not the schools', to teach kids about sex and reproduction.
School should be able to teach if they have parent's consent.
If it is an elective subject not included in the curriculum and teached outside traditional school time, whatever.
Yes. You can't be against this.
I am though.
If parents are unable to teach sex ad to their teenager, who will do it then? Because from what I understand it would be the school in that situation. The parents get to choose if they teach it or the school teaches it.
Parents are always able, since they needed the basic education to conceive the kid receiving the education in the first place. Those who leave third parties to teach their kid in mass-facilities, mainly in such personal topics, are dooming their bloodline.
Unfortunately, you're never going to reason all the (mostly female) teachers
blow jobs, glory holes or golden showers.
I can't imagine being a teenager in school and having my teacher use these phrases.
"Gender theory" is pretty broad. It's interdisciplinary, not exclusively science.
Or are you saying that only science should be taught in any school, and we should do away with the arts and humanities entirely?
OP didn't specify schools
No, they should be told about homosexuals and transvestites as part of their marksmanship training.
they should be told about homosexuals and transvestites as part of their marksmanship training.
Node's School for Spartans
Full disclosure. I think they need to be shown pictures of girls with their tits cut off, boys with their peckers cut off, and the long term effects of puberty blockers. Full disclosure.
I think they need to be shown pictures of girls with their tits cut off, boys with their peckers cut off, and the long term effects of puberty blockers.
Bring in a 30-something dying of an infected penisussy.
Like they did in the 90's with DARE and drug users.
Yea. Let's do that.
Based!
Too open-ended a question. One can discuss a matter without pushing it. In a school setting, it's inappropriate for teachers to fill young heads with any social engineering info.
In any case, the whole tranny craze is nothing more than demagoguery engineered to create division and confusion and has zero to do with group advocacy. Discussing it diverts from more important matters, like addressing those who are pushing identity politics for the purpose of undermining civil society and promoting mental illness so that its sufferers can be exploited.
IDK about "crime," but school curricula are subject to legislation, and I think they should exclude any discussion of hooh-hahs and wing-wangs. Kids don't need "sex education," at least not at school.
And FWIW, kids mostly agree with me. I grew up in the Deep South in the early 1990s, and even then and there the "sex education" we were subjected to disgusted us and just made us think our teacher was a pervert. I can only imagine the shit teachers would say now under the guise of "sex education." It must be absolutely appalling.
I can only imagine the shit teachers would say now
I'm guessing that the "lessons" may in fact not be in lecture form but in printed material that is distributed. As I understand it, there's an push to use the education system to indoctrinate perversion and mental illness as normal lifestyle choices and to exclude the parent from the process. School boards that advocate for that type of "curriculum" should face immediate removal from their positions- with parents having the authority to do so- enforced locally.
As egregious as it is, the rampant abuse should not be reason to grow government even more.
That isn’t an issue. The issue is who tells them and how it is taught. I don’t some dumb asshat teacher teaching my kids about transgenderism. I want to be the one to do so.
Good point. A lot of parent concerns where that they where being teached this without parental consent.
You kind of have to teach kids about transgenderism nowadays so that they're aware it's bullshit before someone else gets to them first, and convinces them it's normal and they should consider if they are a different gender themselves.
A crime to mention it? No.
A crime to try to persuade a child to change their gender behind their parents back? Yes.
A crime to give children under 15 hormone blockers and try to change their biology in the name of transgenderism? Absolutely. Fuck this shit.
You think a adult should be able to tell a 5 year old about transgenderism?
I think any responsible adult wouldn't tell a five year old such fucked-up shit the same way they wouldn't tell them about the Holocaust or rape.
But when you say "leave little kids alone" you get cancelled.
No you don't.
yes you do
It shouldn't be in the year 1 curriculum.
But if a child of any age asks a question, a teacher should not have to break the law or lie.
It should be illegal for them to exist. They're all pedos.
I'm not. But even if what you said were true, it's already illegal to commit sexual acts with a minor, so no need for a trans ban.
And yet they still do it. Those drag shows, in libraries, schools, and churches of all places, and in government establishments. You all molest children, you sick freaks.
I don't like any of it.
No. I support freedom of speech.
No. I support freedom of speech.
I do too. However state mandated degeneracy courses aren't about free speech.
We're talking about fisting, and butt sex.
These aren't independently minded persons, or enlightened educators.
The voices of concern are silenced. It's the opposite of free speech.
I'm taking the OP literally. He didn't talk about anything state-mandated, fisting, or anal sex.
He didn't talk about anything state-mandated
He didn't. But it's so bad, that it's taught in pubic schools.
Most people aren't up in arms about weird family telling their weird children about their weird predilections.
They're outraged that their children are involuntarily exposed to filth in the classroom.
Why does your "freedom of speech" requires you to disseminate transgenderism to pre-14 year olds?
In the OP you literally just mention telling people about transgenderism. Should parents be imprisoned for pointing out the phenomenon to their own children? I don't want to live in a police state. If you meant something else by "telling people about", you should've been more specific.
Should parents be imprisoned for pointing out the phenomenon to their own children
Because like I said, it could cause gender dysphoria if the child learns they could be the "other gender".
Depends on who you're talking about. Do I think teachers or people who deal with kids should just be allowed to blindly have discussions about sexuality, gender, orientation with children? Absolutely not. The first words out of their mouths should be "ask your parents." If the parents are okay with it, then fine. Or if the parents would rather meet privately with those folks and give their guidance as it regards their children, then fine. There is no academic reason to have any discussions about transgenderism with anyone under 18, imo. They have their adulthood to look into that. Let them have their childhood. It baffles me the value we put on gender and sexuality. It has become less about who you are as an individual, and more about activism and virtue signaling.
The problem is not that they know about trannies or their beliefs. The problem is that children too young to think for themselves are being indoctrinated with lies and absolutely insane propaganda. They are getting mindfucked by groomers. That needs to be illegal.
No, they should be made aware that men are dirty like dogs and have disgusting fetishes they destroy their lives and families for.
Yeah, let's make all the boys hate themselves and probably become suicidal and let girls bully them because all men are pigs and rapists who don't deserve human rights, right? /s
Boys are just as much victims of these men as girls.
Or did you forget those abused men exist?
lets focus on women
I'm different jet.
tell them all white people are opressors and all black people are victims too! /s
When do you see evidence of white people oppressing all over the internet every day?
that'd be good but can't be enforced
Why would it be good?
best not to brainwash children
No. But it should be a crime to censor dissenting ideas. That's the real problem. If children hear both sides, most of them will be fine. And if not, they were stupid anyway so we're better off with them sterilized. But when all they hear is propaganda, and from supposed "authorities" like teachers no less, we have a problem.
We're talking about 5 year olds
The title literally says "below 14". if you meant below 6 you should have written that.
But still no.
What the fuck? Hell no. The last thing we need is more censorship and government controlling our lives.
Yes, it should be a crime for anyone but the parents' explicitly authorized people and content to be taught to children.
Kids should learn about all Fictional 'man-made' synthetic things in order to prevent them from thinking mental illness is something that shouldn't be treated.
Like frankestein?
Yes, exactly like the mentally ill, Fictional 'doctor' character that was written to think he knew better than natural state of things.
Why would you want to talk about it, you want your kid to be an idiot ?.
That's a really tough question! It really depends on the context, but I don't think it should be criminalized to share knowledge about trans people and transgenderism with pre-teens. Every kid should feel supported and empowered to explore their own identity if they want to.
Transgenderism exists. Making it a crime for kids to know about it has no merit.
Nobody is saying it doesn't exist
What people are saying is... could this be malicious? Potentially confusing a 5 year old into having gender dysphoria?
Transvestitism exists. There is no such thing as transgenderism.
What do you mean there's no such thing as transgenderism?
You mean you've never personally experienced it?
Or that all the literature about it is a conspiracy theory by the shape-shifting lizards?
Human mammals can't change their sex. Mutilating ones genitals into a Frankencunt or a Frankendick doesn't change one's sex. Pretending to be a different sex is called transvestitism. "Transgenderism" is simply a fantasy that's impossible in real life.
Human mammals can't change their sex.
Well. That's kind of nuanced isn't it?
Why isn't what Eliot Page has done "changing sex", in your definition?
Mutilating ones genitals into a Frankencunt or a Frankendick doesn't change one's sex.
Doesn't it? What is sex?
Pretending to be a different sex is called transvestitism.
No. Transvestism is just cross-dressing.
"Transgenderism" is simply a fantasy that's impossible in real life.
Nothing you've said results in that conclusion. Whether or not people can change their sex, they can still identify as a sex that's different from what they were assigned at birth.
In some cases there's a judgement call as to which sex they are assigned at birth.
[deleted] 10 months ago ago