you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Musky 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Some may not be offenders yet, they're still a potential danger to children.

The only people I've ever seen wonder about pedo shit is pedos btw.

[–]bucetao6969[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

How you suggest deal with that then?

[–]Musky 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

They could be legally mandated to wear a symbol showing they are unsafe to be around children, like a Pride flag, at all times.

[–]MelvinDelvaney 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The legality of mandating individuals to wear a symbol indicating they are unsafe to be around children would depend on the specific laws and regulations of the jurisdiction in question.

In general, laws and regulations related to personal identification symbols can vary significantly between countries and even within different regions of the same country. It is unlikely that a Pride flag, which represents the LGBTQ+ community and is unrelated to child safety concerns, would be used as a symbol in such a context. The idea of mandating individuals to wear a symbol indicating they are unsafe to be around children raises ethical and human rights concerns, such as potential stigmatization and infringement on personal privacy.

It's important to approach matters related to child safety and protection with sensitivity, fairness, and evidence-based strategies. Governments and societies typically focus on implementing laws and regulations that promote the well-being and safety of children while respecting the rights and dignity of all individuals involved. If you have concerns or questions about specific laws or regulations in your jurisdiction, it would be best to consult with a legal professional who can provide advice based on the relevant local laws and regulations.