SaidIt Survey: Ban /u/socks and /u/ActuallyNot or keep them around?

submitted by JasonCarswell from (self.AskSaidIt)

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Tiwaking 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (2 children)

Lie number 1: "I've not previously seen your username" https://saidit.net/s/USPolitics/comments/20aj/who_voted_for_her_she_is_retarded/ Airbus320 2 insightful - 1 fun - 7 months ago u/socks! [–]socks 1 insightful - 1 fun - 7 months ago I wonder why this OP left Saidit, or changed the username. There are some on Saidit who'd happily lick his winky.

Lie number 2: "it's apparent that you don't know what you're arguing about" /u/JasonCarswell can you present the mountain of evidence against /u/socks please?

[–]JasonCarswell[S] 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

Moreover, sealioning doesn't apply - especially on Saidit

IFIFY:
Moreover, sealioning is abundant on Saidit, especially.

Arguing with socks is pointless. No amount of evidence is enough. No one hangs out where they are not welcome unless they're there with a purpose. He's intentionally pretending to not understand. That's how they are effective at disruption and pissing people off. Don't take the bait, don't bother responding unless you're speaking to everyone else reading it.

After all this cools down, next week we'll start some lists and other community projects that may or may not help.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

1) I'm supposed to remember a post of yours from 7 months ago? And do you look at the username when you read a post? (Most of us look mainly at the post, not who posted it.) (Irrelevant)

2) You don't