So you recognize tyranny rising but won't acknowledge any of the details that prove it?

Just because the specific causes you list are nonsense, that doesn't mean the statement "tyranny on the rise" itself is untrue. You can point to NSA dragnet surveillance, constant attempts to curb 2nd Amendment rights, etc. It's just that what you claim are examples really aren't. Climate change is a hoax so attempts to pass regulations that curb it are really just power grabs? No, climate change is real, and even if people are cozying up to government so they can profit from the clean energy revolution, that's not the tyranny you're alluding to. I could go on, but we've already been over this and that conversation would go nowhere.

The notion that tyranny is on the rise is also never something I've argued against, which brings us back to the original point. What do you call this fallacy where you're implying I was arguing against something that is actually defensible, and that I never actually argued against?