you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (10 children)

How many people browse from desktop? I think you will lose more users to other alternatives if you turn the site into a gay "new Saidit" look.

People migrating to saidit are probably former old.reddit.com users.

The mobile browser look is a little homoerotic already.

[–]magnora7[S] 5 insightful - 4 fun5 insightful - 3 fun6 insightful - 4 fun -  (8 children)

homoerotic

Can you speak like an adult instead of a child? I'm not really listening to someone who can't communicate like a grown-up

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (7 children)

Criticizes the tone of the writing without addressing the substance of the argument

[–]magnora7[S] 5 insightful - 4 fun5 insightful - 3 fun6 insightful - 4 fun -  (6 children)

You're the one dragging discussion down the pyramid of debate by calling things you dislike "homoerotic"... don't try and spin this back on me. Nice try though. Step up your game before calling out others.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

I like how you performed this https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vasectomy so gently almost tenderly on him. It'll hurt for weeks to come. I'm sure of that.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (4 children)

Words, I don't want to scare you, but the average person knows over forty thousand and uses them to convey concepts.

You might want to add a list of 'naughty' words to the pyramid of debate so that you can more efficiently bulldoze over the rules whenever you are roleplaying as a user.

[–]magnora7[S] 4 insightful - 4 fun4 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 4 fun -  (1 child)

Now you're playing coy. Please just speak like an adult in the future, don't use ad-hominems for no reason, as you tend to do. That's repeatedly dragging discussion down the pyramid of debate which is against site rules.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

An ad-hominem attack is a fallacy, that is "a statement or an argument based on a false or invalid inference".

Assuming that you are talking about the latter comment being a tu quoque, I want to clarify that my argument there is not meant to imply that my criticism of your user interface is justified because of your hypocritical application of the rules. It is self-contained.

If you are instead referring to my original comment, however, then there is not even a man being attacked. You are using an unorthodox definition for ad hominem that I interpret as "saying naughty words" and so no argument can be had.

[–]JasonCarswell 1 insightful - 3 fun1 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

M7 is the founder and admin.

[–]JasonCarswell 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

" The mobile browser look is a little homoerotic already. "

How so?