Then you have no good justification for banning child pornography.

Our community bans pornography.

I'm trying to point out the hipocracy in your reasoning, you argue that your point of view is the general consensus.

I already pointed this out:

Ahh so you and I have come to the same conclusion about morals and ethics.

"My stance is that people who want to remove peoples ability to vote shouldnt be allowed to vote" <- this line of reasoning fails.

And I've been saying that to come to a consensus you need discussion. I didnt mean a "general consensus". That was my mistake and I should not have included "general" in the quote.

I'm not aware of drunkenness being a successful defence against criminal charges

In my country it is. Ignorance of the law is also a valid defence (i.e. a guy ate a dog once)

If you want my opinion about this whole affair it is this:

1. No sexually objectifying anyone under the age of 25 of any gender.

Maybe I should put this in 'unpopular opinion'?