U.S. Opposes a Ban on Killer Robots–A New Autonomous Form of Warfare–Ahead of U.N. Weapons Summit
submitted 2 years ago by Drewski from (democracynow.org)
view the rest of the comments →
[–]Noam_Chomsky 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun - 2 years ago (13 children)
Why waste a drone when a bullet will do the trick?
Mini Drones with infrared cameras. And bullets.
Everyone has seen videos of anti missile gatling guns.
Marketing.
[–]Canbot 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun - 2 years ago (12 children)
Marketing
Yeah, but they exist already. If you watch them closely you can see that they aren't shooting regular bullets. They are shooting small guided missiles. They look like tracer rounds because they have an exhaust. They also have a non ballistic trajectory.
[–]Noam_Chomsky 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun - 2 years ago (11 children)
Guided or not, they won't hit a missile going mach 2.
Also, drones are small and cheaper.
They can shoot from above (out of range), and wait for their target(s).
A swarm of 5-10 drones could take out most groups.
You'd never know they were there until the rounds were flying.
[–]Canbot 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun - 2 years ago (10 children)
They just have to get in the way. Missiles going mach 2 aren't maneuverable.
[–]Noam_Chomsky 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - 2 years ago (9 children)
You're describing impossible timing.
Missle defenses are an illusion. They're nearly impossible to intercept/block. MIC boondoggles.
Most of them will get through.
[–]Canbot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - 2 years ago (8 children)
No timing required. Determine the trajectory and send a rocket down that trajectory in the opposite direction.
[–]Noam_Chomsky 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - 2 years ago (7 children)
No timing required.
This could work if you could:
Determine the trajectory and send a rocket down that trajectory in the opposite direction.
How would you determine this? There's a radar that does this for artillery, but it can only determine this info after the ordinance land. It can't see the future.
You are proposing an interceptor that doesn't require precise timing. It's a contradiction.
[–]Canbot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - 2 years ago (6 children)
Your belief in the limitations of top secret military tech is silly. The travel time of missiles will allow for several minutes of calculations. Some guessing will be involved, but given that you already know where your high value assets are it's quite an educated guess.
[–]Noam_Chomsky 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - 2 years ago (5 children)
The travel time of missiles will allow for several minutes of calculations.
Israel has the best "iron dome" US taxpayers can buy, yet the slowest, crappiest rockets imaginable keep getting through. Regularly.
[–]Canbot 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun - 2 years ago (4 children)
Isreal keeps shooting those rockets at itself to collect ungodly amounts of welfare money from countries around the world. They receive more aid than any other country despite being one of the richest per capita. Those "rockets" conveniently NEVER kill anyone.
use the following search parameters to narrow your results:
e.g. sub:pics site:imgur.com dog
sub:pics site:imgur.com dog
advanced search: by author, sub...
~1 user here now
Antiwar related articles and discussion
view the rest of the comments →
[–]Noam_Chomsky 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun - (13 children)
[–]Canbot 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun - (12 children)
[–]Noam_Chomsky 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun - (11 children)
[–]Canbot 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun - (10 children)
[–]Noam_Chomsky 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - (9 children)
[–]Canbot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - (8 children)
[–]Noam_Chomsky 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - (7 children)
[–]Canbot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - (6 children)
[–]Noam_Chomsky 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - (5 children)
[–]Canbot 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun - (4 children)