use the following search parameters to narrow your results:
e.g. sub:pics site:imgur.com dog
sub:pics site:imgur.com dog
advanced search: by author, sub...
~4 users here now
All about this website
Proposed features and enhancements for AntiExtremes (self.AntiExtremes)
submitted 1 year ago * by magnora7 - announcement
view the rest of the comments →
[–]Node 3 insightful - 1 funny3 insightful - 0 funny4 insightful - 0 funny4 insightful - 1 funny - 1 year ago (4 children)
I agree with Jesus on the sub-10 limit. Pretty sure you don't want to end up with guys modding 171 subs.
The once per week limit, with the initial delay, seems like a reasonable way to combat drive-by shilling too. And/or just to give the miscreants time to identify themselves. If they can hold it in for two weeks, maybe that's how they normally are.
[–]magnora7[S] 3 insightful - 1 funny3 insightful - 0 funny4 insightful - 0 funny4 insightful - 1 funny - 1 year ago (0 children)
Yeah exactly, the slower things roll out, the more obvious each of their bad moves will become. It easier to build a pattern over time and easy to avoid an 1-day dedicated attack. I think we'll do this.
[–]Jesus 2 insightful - 1 funny2 insightful - 0 funny3 insightful - 0 funny3 insightful - 1 funny - 1 year ago (2 children)
10-limit sub creation possibly, or no subs for six to tten days for a new user followed by being able to create one or two for around a month and then doing the time limit with a possible limit in the number of subs.
So, in total...
0 subs for 6-10 days
1-2 subs for 1 month to 2 months
10 subs after the 1 to 2 month period with a time limit inbetween each created sub.
(excluding the owner of the site of course.
[–]Node 1 insightful - 1 funny1 insightful - 0 funny2 insightful - 0 funny2 insightful - 1 funny - 1 year ago (0 children)
Sounds very reasonable, and in line with the goal of having moderators active on the subs they control or assist with.