subscribed

Aureus

Trans women act like men. Almost as if ...
Aureus 6 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 2 fun 2 years ago

These "feminist" shills were the strongest supporters of the T in the first place. The fact that they realize they were wrong but refuse to let go of the hateful dogma that got them here in the first place is enfuriating and I will not ally with them.

This is basically my opinion as well. I have a great write-up about it here. I was tepid about it then but now I'm absolutely sure of it.

Feminism built the institutions, voted for the politicians, developed the ideology, and pioneered the strategies that the trans movement now uses in their gambit for cultural dominance. Tactics like deplatforming, cancel culture, and safe spaces did not come out of the ether. They were developed and widely used by feminism, and feminism is now being hoisted by its own petard.

PLEASE READ: This is what happened yesterday and why. It was a classic Psy-Op against the American people. However, these Psy-Ops are totally preventable if we can learn the lessons from this one.
Aureus[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun 3 years ago

I was going to write a long response to this, but I'll keep it simple.

And when I ask individuals this question, the answers usually either 1) seem pretty fucking left to me, or 2) are not at all what Republican/conservative politicians are doing or have expressed desire to do.

I don't see laissez-faire economics as bedrock-foundational to conservatism. So if you asked me what conservative values are, you might hear a "pretty left" answer in terms of economics.

The real divide, and the reason why the website you're using exists at all, is the difference in cultural values.

If you asked average Democrats and Republicans about their economic values, you probably wouldn't get wildly diverging answers. You might even get answers that seem "pretty fucking left". Consider the issue of $2000 checks, for example.

If you asked them about culture, however... good luck.

Just an example: the conservative opinion on family, and the opinion that family is an evil patriarchical construct that must be abolished, are in two different moral universes.

Another example: the neoliberal censorship that is the reason this website exists. You can't say you don't understand the divide when you are currently using a website that is the product of that divide.

This is why I'm trying to build bridges. If you set up a candidate who is anti-war and pro-welfare for Americans, I guarantee you that you could get conservatives to support that candidate in droves as long as they leave the culture stuff behind. They don't have to be outspoken one way or the other. Just don't openly pledge to use the full power of government to fuck over conservatives on cultural issues.

You get a politician who stands by all the lefty policies you love. Conservatives get a candidate who is objectively better for them, doesn't explicitly hate them as a demographic, and doesn't push the "Republican" BS everybody hates.

Orrrrrr we could keep dividing the proles against each other on hot-button cultural issues that ultimately mean nothing, as each votes in neoliberal/neoconservative candidates on a 4-year rotating cycle, who do nothing but expand the powers of the police and surveillance states. Conservatives supporting free trade and tax cuts to "own the libs", leftists supporting woke monopolistic megacorporations and foreign wars to "own the cons".

PLEASE READ: This is what happened yesterday and why. It was a classic Psy-Op against the American people. However, these Psy-Ops are totally preventable if we can learn the lessons from this one.
Aureus[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun 3 years ago

Well said.

Spending taxes on national defense = right-wing conservatism Spending taxes on national medicine = left-wing socialism

To be fair, I think a lot of people are waking up to this and rejecting it.

PLEASE READ: This is what happened yesterday and why. It was a classic Psy-Op against the American people. However, these Psy-Ops are totally preventable if we can learn the lessons from this one.
Aureus[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun 3 years ago

In 2016, who seemed more like the "change" candidate, and who seemed more like the "establishment" candidate?

This might give you a hint: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FLfvXjKMwtI

In 2020, which candidate gave a speech to wealthy donors promising "nothing would fundamentally change" under his presidency?

PLEASE READ: This is what happened yesterday and why. It was a classic Psy-Op against the American people. However, these Psy-Ops are totally preventable if we can learn the lessons from this one.
Aureus[S] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun 3 years ago

You're right, but this is something we all ought to know. These kinds of events are obviously traps and should be avoided.

PLEASE READ: This is what happened yesterday and why. It was a classic Psy-Op against the American people. However, these Psy-Ops are totally preventable if we can learn the lessons from this one.
Aureus[S] 7 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 0 fun8 insightful - 1 fun 3 years ago

First off, thank you for your response.

Who is that, and where are they? That's what we need to know, before we begin assembling the response @Aureus recommends.

You're absolutely correct. However, I don't think identifying "who" is as important as how they operate and how we can emulate that. I've seen a lot of discussions get bogged down into who the elite really are - is this public figure one of them, or are they a freethinker? You can see how that would devolve into pointless arguments and finger-pointing.

But what's absolutely vital is discussion. At least it would be better than the incessant newsposting.

I don't see the key that will allow conservatives to be coherent; it is their nature to be individual rather than committed to a common vision.

You might be right. Unfortunately I don't see a way out that involves purely individual thinking. "United we stand, divided we fall" has too much truth to it.

One of the few individual solutions I can think of would be enjoying the decline, and participating in enjoyable pursuits rather than focusing on politics. Unfortunately, mainstream conservatives doing that is one of the main reasons we're here today.

Twitter blocks medical journal after it published a positive study on Ivermectin treatment for coronavirus
Aureus 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun 3 years ago

Responding to top comment just to say the medical journal is the European Journal of Medical and Health Sciences, located at https://ejmed.org

Might be worth a bookmark. If they're willing to publish actual research they deserve to be un-cancelled.

Is it possible to make a Twitter or Parler account without using your real phone number?
Aureus[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun 3 years ago

Yeah, I was thinking of this too. A Google Voice number would work for Twitter, but then Google has your real phone number.

Man Hasn’t Been to the Grocery Store in 8 Months Thanks to Tiny Pandemic Garden Inspired By Grandfather
Aureus 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun 3 years ago

Great article, thanks for sharing! Everyone should start a garden

A LOT of healthcare workers are refusing to get the Covid vaccine. Look at these numbers.
Aureus 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun 3 years ago

It's a never-before-used technology and it hasn't even gone through Phase III trials (which were required for every other vaccine before this). That's a good enough reason for anybody.

Is it possible to make a Twitter or Parler account without using your real phone number?
Aureus[S] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun 3 years ago

Thanks for the suggestion, but many of the accounts I want to follow aren't on Gab. Gab is a much smaller platform and doesn't benefit from the huge network effect that Twitter has.

P2P Networking: An Information-Sharing Alternative
Aureus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun 3 years ago

Any good ways to get started with this?

Plan of Action: Taking Care of Our Communities (1:12:25) ~ Redneckonomics
Aureus 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun 3 years ago

Thanks for posting this here!

I'm watching it now, but could you give a quick summary on what this video is about and what you like about it?

My Thoughts on What's Wrong with Saidit
Aureus 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun 3 years ago

Hey, thanks for mentioning me. I totally agree with your post btw. It's a shame it's not getting the appreciation it deserves.

I haven't been active on this site for some time for exactly the reasons you describe. The only advantage a site like this could have over others is quality discussion and content, but very few seem interested in posting that. The majority of content is recycled political news. The number of users interested in quality discussion is so small that it would almost be more efficient to make a private IRC channel or Element channel or something.

I'm not sure how to fix the issues you bring up. I totally agree with limiting link posts though. I'm open to discuss any of this if you're interested.

My Thoughts on What's Wrong with Saidit
Aureus 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun 3 years ago

Very well said.

i voted
Aureus 12 insightful - 1 fun12 insightful - 0 fun13 insightful - 1 fun 3 years ago

At least you didn't vote for Biden, but still, I don't think this accomplished much other than a protest vote.