sorted by:
new
hottopinsightfulfun

/u/Questionable is a pedo apologist. Denies existence of convicted pedophiles, claims sexual urges aren’t the problem, justifies “silent majority” protecting pedophiles ‛cause we’re using the “wrong term” for them, then tries to pillory righteous Saidittor for exposing pedophiles in public office. by --88--MPH in whatever

[–]--88--MPH[S] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Personally, I just took a quick online test that looked kinda serious (a research project, apparently), and got ISTP as a result.

:shrugs:

/u/Questionable is a pedo apologist. Denies existence of convicted pedophiles, claims sexual urges aren’t the problem, justifies “silent majority” protecting pedophiles ‛cause we’re using the “wrong term” for them, then tries to pillory righteous Saidittor for exposing pedophiles in public office. by --88--MPH in whatever

[–]--88--MPH[S] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

as you run out of options

Not any time soon, buddy. 😌

^(And we haven't even used the real reference yet... 🤫)

/u/Questionable is a pedo apologist. Denies existence of convicted pedophiles, claims sexual urges aren’t the problem, justifies “silent majority” protecting pedophiles ‛cause we’re using the “wrong term” for them, then tries to pillory righteous Saidittor for exposing pedophiles in public office. by --88--MPH in whatever

[–]--88--MPH[S] 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

It's simple:

No one is safe.

We don't care if you're Jewish, conservative, socialist, pedophile, anti-pedophile, Muslim, whathaveyou.

You fuck up.

You may have it coming.

#EgalitarianismFTW 😌

/u/Questionable is a pedo apologist. Denies existence of convicted pedophiles, claims sexual urges aren’t the problem, justifies “silent majority” protecting pedophiles ‛cause we’re using the “wrong term” for them, then tries to pillory righteous Saidittor for exposing pedophiles in public office. by --88--MPH in whatever

[–]--88--MPH[S] 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

What "campaign"?

only back it up with a screenshot of a debate

"Only"? What exactly do you back up your "bullshit" accusation with? That I do not provide even MORE undeniable, irrefutable proof than already? 😆

Dude... either you're a severe case of 88 Derangement Syndrome, or... you're one of (((them))). 🤨

As for the other three pedo apologists named: plenty of evidence including screenshots has already been provided to back that up. After all, raving about sex with minors was one of the express reasons why /u/magnora7 eventually banned /u/AmericanMuskrat.

/u/Questionable is a pedo apologist. Denies existence of convicted pedophiles, claims sexual urges aren’t the problem, justifies “silent majority” protecting pedophiles ‛cause we’re using the “wrong term” for them, then tries to pillory righteous Saidittor for exposing pedophiles in public office. by --88--MPH in whatever

[–]--88--MPH[S] 8 insightful - 2 fun8 insightful - 1 fun9 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

bullshit

Are you saying the screenshot is fake? The comment is still online.

/u/Questionable is a pedo apologist. Denies existence of convicted pedophiles, claims sexual urges aren’t the problem, justifies “silent majority” protecting pedophiles ‛cause we’re using the “wrong term” for them, then tries to pillory righteous Saidittor for exposing pedophiles in public office.

by --88--MPH to /s/whatever from self.whatever

If I Can't Even Afford Raman by Tarrock in LateStageCapitalism

[–]--88--MPH 0 insightful - 2 fun0 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Reminds me...

If I Can't Even Afford Raman by Tarrock in LateStageCapitalism

[–]--88--MPH 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Couple of things tho:

  • 1) It's "ramen". Not to be a spelling Nazi, but it even reads correctly on her sign. (So I guess she's on campus for a reason, after all, huh? 😅)

  • 2) She says IF. It's a conditional statement. Meaning she does not necessarily claim not being able to even afford ramen at present.

  • 3) Could be stolen.

:shrugs: