you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Bitch-Im-a-cow 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (4 children)

Other way round.

Men in their early 20s are the philsophical, idealist communists, whereas women are the ambitious, practical capitalists.

[–]jet199Instigatrix[S] 5 insightful - 4 fun5 insightful - 3 fun6 insightful - 4 fun -  (3 children)

[–]Bitch-Im-a-cow 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Article only for subscribers. But I see that Daniel is himself seemingly in his 20s, and uses survey data to write clickbait. It's not like he understands the human condition or human growth and development.

EDIT: And I now see that he focuses on division (typical of the right wing), and on his support for Trump and right wing misinformation. What a pathetic tool. Jet, you're supporting the right wing's misogynist pandering to idiots who want to think that men are smarter and are thus capitalist and right wing whereas women are idiots and are thus pinko liberal commies. Fuck that.

[–]jet199Instigatrix[S] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

Typical, attacking the messenger and thinking that makes you smart when it's actually the opposite.

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2024/feb/02/first-edition-gen-z-men-women-political

Not my fault that whenever you start talking to a women she pretends she's right wing to scare you off.

[–]Bitch-Im-a-cow 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

What I write in my original response has been known for millennia about human development. Women have always had to mature earlier than men, due to their greater responsibilities for the home and children. Men traditionally are more idealistic and less practical in their earlier years. This is common knowledge for anyone who has read about human development and approaches to the human condition in society and global communities.

You don't have to know any of this, but do consider why your post proposes the opposite of the norm: it's obviously part of the far right's latest approach to their "war on woke", part of which is to insult women (eg. calling them communists), which resonates with the misogyny of many on the far right. Statistics can be used to support their claims, where many are increasingly disconnected from human contact, leading to a rise in misogyny. Attacking women's rights (eg. right to abortion in the first term of pregancy) has been part of that war on woke, and quite successful in the US.

(Hope you were able to see Jeremy Hunt's budget statement, and will see Starmer's response.)