you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Vulptex[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

That's not "the point", that's how a lot of traits work and it's the reason males have so many more defects and health problems than females. For any given defect on the sex chromosome, females have a backup.

Now gathering is the supposed reason for females seeing more shades than males. But I've questioned several people and haven't found any difference at all, so chances are it's bullshit. Probably just men not paying attention to small details even if they can see them. Although it's possible I have more female-typical traits in this area. I can say I definitely would've been a gatherer, I could never handle hunting.

If they had been lacking in these attributes, the tribe would have starved. Color vision would have been wasted on them.

See with males, it's always about how they can benefit the tribe and nothing else. But the females' own wellbeing and dignity is considered important. As ironic as it is, the female design seems tailored to individual needs, whereas the male design is tailored for collective needs. This is what I mean when I say nature treats males like trash. They don't matter to nature, only their usefulness does.

[–]SPedigrees 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

Evolution was a survival strategy which worked equally well back in the day for both genders and for the species as a whole.

What you're talking about is something completely different. You seem to have a bit of a persecution complex. Women were considered chattel for much of history and still are in a large part of the world, so an equal and opposite argument could be made there. Either way it is irrelevant to the reason why Mother Nature originally doled out different attributes to each sex which, at the time, were useful to humans of both genders for survival.

[–]Vulptex[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

No, it definitely worked better for females. Mother Nature deems them valuable and males worthless. Both sexes were given attributes that work best for the female's wellbeing. Females are the original, males are clones repurposed for nothing but battle and hard labor. Mother nature then put the males in charge most of the time, ensuring that they both suffer immensely.

[–]SPedigrees 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

You've got some issues, man.