u/Americanmuskrat deleted his account
submitted 1 year ago by gloomy_bear from (self.whatever)
view the rest of the comments →
[–][deleted] 1 year ago (5 children)
[deleted]
[–]Site_rly_sux 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - 1 year ago (4 children)
Epestine island
Alex didn't break this, he didn't know anything about this before it was covered in other media. And he has never acknowledged that Trump rode the lolita express so many times. For example, try this search, there are zero results.
https://www.google.com/search?q=epstein+site%3Ainfowars.com+before%3A2018
frogs are gay.
Alex doesn't know about which species of frog or whatever is in his story. He doesn't care about laws and bills or attempts to ban that chemical or where those bills got to in committee - and he'd have no explanation if the senators and reps he supports, are the ones blocking progress in banning those chemicals. Because he does not care about the topic.
He does not care about wildlife. He cares about convincing his audience that the elites are attacking their dicks, as a means to sell boner pills. He cares about concern trolling and signalling transphobic "virtue" to his listeners. The frogs story is only a vehicle for his hate.
UFOs
Alex doesn't cover UFOs and I agree he's right not to.
Pedofilia in the ruling class
He says he wouldn't let Brian Stelter babysit his kids, but Alex has never talked about trump on the lolita express or this world leader touching kids. I don't know what you're referring to here. Alex apologised profusely to James Alefantis for his comet ping pong coverage. So I don't know of any real coverage which Alex has provided here, can you point me to some?
Bohemian grove
Which Alex attended with Jon Ronson. Heres what Jon had to say
https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/frontline/interview/jon-ronson/
Jon talks about why Alex lied so heavily about what they saw there. On Alex -
You know, narcissists, the rules don’t apply to them. So, it kind of, it kind of doesn’t matter whether it was true or not… I could see straightaway that he was exaggerating what we saw and refused to believe that the owls were there for more innocent reasons then his Moloch theory
You know, narcissists, the rules don’t apply to them. So, it kind of, it kind of doesn’t matter whether it was true or not…
I could see straightaway that he was exaggerating what we saw and refused to believe that the owls were there for more innocent reasons then his Moloch theory
You asked me
Do you even know what you are talking about? Calling Alex Jones out, and not even knowing his content.
Yes, believe me I can talk all day about this. Sounds like, if you don't like his voice, maybe I'm more familiar with this topic than you are.
[–][deleted] 1 year ago (2 children)
[–]Site_rly_sux 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - 1 year ago* (1 child)
Nevertheless, you can’t deny that he bring mass attention to valid conspiracies.
I absolutely deny it. When I think of valid conspiracies like
Manafort / Kilimnik spy ring
The secretive forces behind Europe's far right problem
The spies behind 2017 attempted coup in Montenegro
These real conspiracies are not touched by infowars with a ten foot pole. The conspiracies which alex does cover, are mostly totally fake and stewed in the racism and bigotry which his Bircher parents instilled in him.
Then there are the real conspiracies which Alex didn't just ignore, but had some weird part of. I do believe that infowars had some weird possibly coincidental advance knowledge of Erdogan's fake "coup".
https://knowledgefight.libsyn.com/knowledge-fight-2015-investigation-last-looks
Go to 2:15:00 to hear Alex in his own words explain how he believes his site was hacked to post a story about Gulemists overthrowing Erdogan....the fake/coup attempt happened the next year, in 2016
use the following search parameters to narrow your results:
e.g. sub:pics site:imgur.com dog
sub:pics site:imgur.com dog
advanced search: by author, sub...
~3 users here now
view the rest of the comments →
[–][deleted] (5 children)
[deleted]
[–]Site_rly_sux 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - (4 children)
[–][deleted] (2 children)
[deleted]
[–]Site_rly_sux 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - (1 child)