The pyramid of debate is stupid

submitted by Klenvastergan from (self.whatever)

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–][deleted]  (10 children)

[deleted]

    [–]Klenvastergan[S] 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (9 children)

    Not from this site, no. I have never posted on this site before now under any name.

    If I had been, that would be useful and relevant information though.

    Thank you for helping to demonstrate my point on the value of ad hominems.

    [–]bobbobbybob 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (4 children)

    tam is... needy and uptight, ignore it

    [–]Klenvastergan[S] 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

    Never ignore anything.

    Truth is God.

    [–]bobbobbybob 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

    good luck with truth there.... some people twist and turn and avoid even admitting the last thing they wrote

    [–]Klenvastergan[S] 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

    Which reveals many interesting truths!

    [–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    I am quite uptight, that's true.

    [–][deleted]  (3 children)

    [deleted]

      [–]Klenvastergan[S] 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

      Every person who says things you don't like sounds like some other person you don't like because things you don't like remind you of other things you don't like, and because lots of people sound like lots of people.

      Accusing new people on web sites who say controversial things of being some previous banned person is usually a good sign that you yourself are way too involved in web sites. It also indicates you are generally hostile towards people who say controversial things, and the fact that this person you're calling a "troll" (which almost always just means "person who says controversial things") for being reminiscent of my post was banned indicates that this website is generally hostile towards people who say controversial things.

      I'm going to go further and predict right now that application of the pyramid of debate by whoever decides how it's applied is heavily biased and generally used as a control method against people who say things that are too controversial.

      But that remains to be seen.

      [–]StrategicTactic 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

      If it is the same as this username that I knew on ruqqus, yes he was banned for spam, but on there. However, a good number of the recent bans I believe were in bad faith, including his. I disagreed with many of his methods and arguments but he did engage forthrightly.

      [–]Klenvastergan[S] 1 insightful - 3 fun1 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

      Thank you! Yes that was me.