25 NASA Scientists Question the Sanity of the Global Warmists

submitted by sawboss from (youtube.com)

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Tom_Bombadil 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

I understand the sciences on an applied professional level.

For the better part of 30 years, I was in agreement with the man made climate change consensus; until I personally investigated the facts.

At that point (with great difficulty) I has the choice of changing my view, or accept intellectual dishonesty.

Through great effort, I chose the intellectually honest path. I'm sure you'd agree that It is much easier to go with the group think consensus on this issue.

Unfortunately, the evidence does not support the man made climate change model.

The environmental weather is exactly what we should expect if we follow the long-term 1000 year historical trend.

The p-hacked models and graphs that say otherwise, are bogus.

[–]endopassing 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

until I personally investigated the facts

That's damn interesting. How did you do that?

Unfortunately, the evidence does not support the man made climate change model.

Again, that's extremely interesting. How did you assess the models what were your findings. What data did you use, and what method did you use to analyze the data?

On a personal level I would also be very interested in what software you used in your analysis.

[–]Tom_Bombadil 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

How did you do that?

I'd like to invite anyone interested in investigating these details to check the following:.

  • Pick a date and a range to evaluate. 1970, or 80, etc. 30 yrs, 40 yrs, etc.
  • Find a measurable factor to track:. sea level rise, temp, etc.
  • Find an original source document that can't be edited after the fact (newspaper, movie, book (revision, date publishing date is crucial).
  • Record the predicted factor: sea level rise, temp, etc.
  • Find current sources and document the actual factor: sea level rise, temp, etc.
  • Compare predicted vs. actual.
  • Done.

On a personal level I would also be very interested in what software you used in your analysis.

Fancy software like minitab or JMP to analyze the facts.

Simply review the historical record vs. predicted. It's basic arithmetic, with original sources.

One last note:. You may recall that man made climate change was one called man made global warming.

They changed the name, because the warming trend was bogus, and indefensible.