you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

I believe the point here is that Google's algo didn't use any database of grandmaster games, or chess history at all. It "learned it all" in "4 hours". Yes I suffered through the whole damn video.

[–]trident765 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

Ok, then what I wrote doesn't apply.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

hahha,. The devil is in the details. What if google trained* their algo against stockfish itself?