Meet the founders of tinder:

trident765 · 2023-09-16T04:44:41+00:00

They are Iranian Jews and they could pass for Indians. They would get zero matches on the app they invented.

trident765 · 2023-03-04T04:21:33+00:00

I sometimes fantasize about making my pronouns slight misspellings such as hee/heem/hees. Would people have to respect it? Could I correct people if they refer to me as "him" instead of "heem"?

trident765 · 2022-12-20T23:53:35+00:00

Aspartame is poison. I was drinking it every day and it was giving me memory and concentration problems. When I stopped drinking it the problems went away.

trident765 · 2022-12-11T00:19:08+00:00

Real world programming often involves understanding the natural world, which computers today cannot do. A very small portion of my work resembles the algorithmic programming challenges on those websites. Most of the problems I solve are: Someone wants to control some real-world thing with their computer, and I have to figure out how to write software to enable them to do this. AIs do not understand the real world, so they are not coming close to being able to do this kind of work.

trident765 · 2022-11-09T09:22:15+00:00

When I read the title I thought it was some kind of metaphor for how Zelenskyy is an actor.

trident765 · 2022-10-24T00:03:01+00:00

I got 5812104600.

If the answer is 400001 then how would you find it?

After the 2nd bulk shuffle the deck would be at the 800000th shuffle. If the answer is 400001, then the 800000th shuffle will be identical to the 399999th shuffle, so I will find the 800000th (399999th) shuffle in the precomputed table, and then this would tell me to subtract 800000 - 399999 = 400001.

Here is my code:

https://pastebin.com/YTjL9d1i

trident765 · 2022-10-22T17:36:17+00:00

Ok I solved it by recognizing that the result of shuffling n times is the mapping indices to perform n shuffles. So I precomputed the first n shuffles (I used 400000 for n), and then bulk shuffled the fast way that I just described until I got a result that was in the precomputed shuffles.

trident765 · 2022-10-20T12:08:03+00:00

This problem has no solution. The cards added to the top of the deck makes the shuffling of one size deck too different from the other. So there is no pattern that can be observed and exploited.

Of course, I am sure a Silicon Valley scum will be able to solve this by applying some bizarre mathematical trick. But knowledge of these mathematical tricks has little use in the real world.

I had a friend who was good at solving these types of problems but he a dumbass when it came to common sense. First he lost a bunch of money by investing in obscure cryptocurrencies. And when psychopaths took over my department at work he was completely oblivious to what was happening. He embraced liberalism with all his heart, and believed that those who spread disinfo about the vaccine are a threat to society.

trident765 · 2022-09-28T03:14:18+00:00

Did you report this sub to the admins after I unbanned you?

trident765 · 2022-09-27T06:52:02+00:00

I was the founder of the r/truecels subreddit on reddit which is effectively the community that went on to be r/incels. In the early months there was another sub called r/ForeverUnwanted which was initially more popular, but they kept banning people until it became a boring echo chamber. On r/truecels, however, women and "normies" were allowed to come and debate incels, and the incels would just verbally destroy them, so it was a more interesting sub. In the longer term r/ForeverUnwanted died off due to inactivity but r/truecels thrived.

trident765 · 2022-09-27T06:36:42+00:00

There are no rules for posters at the moment.

The rules for moderators are:

1) No banning users unless they violate a rule, or there is some emergency reason (e.g. there is a spambot or illegal content)

2) A new rule for posters will require my consent. For something like a rule banning women, I would recommend making a post proposing the rule so we can get input from the community.

Would you agree to these?

trident765 · 2022-09-26T22:05:09+00:00

I am open to this. He does not have to apologize. Just agree to not ban users unless they violate established rules (except in extreme cases). I am personally do not see anything wrong with allowing women to post, but I am open to making a rule banning them if a clear majority of posters here support it.

trident765 · 2022-09-26T21:12:06+00:00

I did not know that. But why should women be banned?

trident765 · 2022-09-16T23:41:30+00:00

I would be in jail.

trident765 · 2022-09-07T07:56:20+00:00

AI generates its are by interpolating what other artists have done, so it depends on the creativity of other artists. A good society would reward artists that contribute to society's creativity output, and not reward the artists that just plagiarize other artists. I would argue AI generated art just adds noise to the system, because it plagiarizes in a difficult to detect way. With humans combining multiple pieces is not plagiarism, because when they do this they will inevitably put their own creative spin on it, but AI purely interpolates.

trident765 · 2022-08-28T23:03:20+00:00

Done

trident765 · 2022-08-28T00:39:37+00:00

This is old copypasta but I am the original author of this.

trident765 · 2022-08-21T22:48:14+00:00

In high school I went back and forth between hanging out with the good-grades nerds, and the low IQ losers. I found the low IQ losers to be more tolerable than the nerds, so eventually I abandoned the nerds and hung out with low IQ losers. But then the low IQ losers started bullying me, and after that I started eating lunch alone for the rest of high school, and I graduated high school friendless.

trident765 · 2022-08-21T20:08:37+00:00

Technology used to be a means of sending information. But now you cannot trust what you see on technology, so we are losing this ability. If you wanted to prove something to someone 100 years ago you could show them a photograph. This is no longer the case. We have to start relying on our eyes and ears again, just like the 1700s.

trident765 · 2022-08-19T03:36:44+00:00

What about dysgenics?

trident765 · 2022-08-18T01:45:27+00:00

Violence involves the use of physical force. What was the physical force here?

trident765 · 2022-08-18T00:12:07+00:00

What is the violent thing he was advocating?

trident765 · 2022-08-14T21:13:31+00:00

The walls are so thin here that last night I could hear a young woman next door trying but failing to contain her moans while she was getting fucked by a Chad. This was actually one of the things that pushed me over the edge, because whether the tenant was the slut or the Chad, the fact that the tenant was having sex in modern culture means the tenant must be scum. Then I figured that since the tenant is scum, the reason they are letting their dog bark like this is probably purely because they are extremely inconsiderate. So in an impulsive fit of rage I contacted the apartment complex. I was planning on leaving a note on their door, but these are the thoughts that made me change my mind.

trident765 · 2022-08-14T17:15:12+00:00

I agree.

trident765 · 2022-08-13T21:59:19+00:00

Because it shows that single adults are less educated, less likely to be employed, make less income. If women were attracted to stupid losers, then the charts would show that all the partnered men are on welfare.

trident765 · 2022-08-13T02:55:47+00:00

How can the IQ of 1700 be like that of today? Francis Bacon lived before then, and he is in my opinion the greatest genius to have ever existed in history. Does anyone alive today come close to rivalling Francis Bacon's intelligence? Does anyone come close to rivalling Isaac Newton's intelligence? Does anyone come close to rivalling Bach's intelligence?

trident765 · 2022-08-12T20:43:04+00:00

This gives me some comfort. I hope what you are saying is true.

trident765 · 2022-08-12T19:35:16+00:00

I didn't ask a question because they loved him too much and I didn't want to spoil their fun. It looks like he is going to be offered the job.

Of course all this depends on to what degree your teammates are modern scum.

I think they are non-scum, but they are naive non-scum. They have good values, write good software, but they fell for this guy who I strongly suspect has values that are contrary to theirs, because they fell for his charisma and virtue signaling (for example, he kept mentioning how he was a "proud new dad" and included photos of his infant kids in his presentation and his resume).

In the panel interview someone asked him a question similar to the question about teams, and he responded saying he prefers software development to be "dynamic" (by the way, modern scum love using vaguely defined words) and I think by this he meant that multiple people contribute to a software because afterwards he made a joke about how he gets overwhelmed when he is solely responsible for a software. One of the people on the panel who especially loved this guy said "that's great we do that here too! We each have our own projects we are responsible for, and then every once in a while we work together on the things that overlap". Basically he "corrected" the answer for him, and moved on. He didn't dig deeper, or ask him to clarify what he meant by "dynamic", because he liked his charisma so much that he was almost afraid of prying more, for fear of finding out something that would hurt his candidacy.

When I submitted my review of the candidate, I said that I was impressed by his presentation and experience, but that I felt like I knew very little about his personality, because the panel did not ask him any concrete questions about situations in the workplace, and I recommended for the next panel to ask more personality questions. Even by leaving this I felt like I was being too critical, because of how much everyone else loved him.

I think it is horrible that my teammates allowed themselves to be disarmed by this guy's public speaking skills. Just because someone is good at public speaking doesn't mean he will be a pleasant person to work with. They should have reflected on their values prior to the interview, and then asked questions to make sure the candidate's values were values that they found tolerable. But they liked his public speaking skills so they just assumed his values were good and gave him a "freebie" in that aspect of the interview.

trident765 · 2022-08-12T16:02:48+00:00

I sat through the interview I confirm he is 100% a modern scum. He even had a psychopathic gaze, and he was charming and charismatic. All my teammates loved him. I felt bad about the idea of asking a difficult question because they loved him so much, and I didn't want to be seen as negative by being the only person to ask a negative question. So I remained silent and did not ask my question, even when I was asked. He breezed through the interview and no one asked him any difficult questions, like they asked me when I had my interview. They just assumed he was a good guy because he was charismatic. The team members were so impressed by his charisma that the interview was more about impressing him than about vetting him.

They haven't discussed him yet, but I think it is 100% settled that he will be offered the job. My teammates just loved him too much. I regret so much that I did not ask my question. I want to cry.

trident765 · 2022-08-10T03:02:57+00:00

Why? A hug just leaves you feeling more unsatisfied.

For me, I just started seeing prostitutes when I was 26. My last city had a booming red light district so it was easy to find prostitutes that way. Unfortunately in my current city the police crack down pretty hard on prostitution, so the scene here sucks, so I don't see prostitutes any more.

I highly recommend prostitutes if you have no chance of getting into a relationship. I felt a million times better after losing my virginity. I was becoming extremely depressed and then losing my virginity cured me. There is still something missing, but life after prostitutes is much better than life before. I felt awesome the first time, like I found the cheat code to life.

trident765 · 2022-08-09T23:29:40+00:00

You seem incapable of thinking broadly. You answer the specific comment, but your comments are inconsistent with each other. For example, in one comment you appeal to statistics, and when I doubted the utility of statistics, you say statistics don't matter and start making some tangential argument that has nothing to do with the original point I made. You are a task-oriented thinker.

trident765 · 2022-08-09T20:34:04+00:00

What is your view? Do you even have one? You seem to keep changing direction in order to negate my comments.

trident765 · 2022-08-09T18:16:32+00:00

A few centuries ago marriages between older men and teen girls were common, just browse Wikipedia articles of random famous people born in the Renaissance. Marriages from this time period were stabler than those of today. I am going to trust this over some "statistics" published by some blue haired feminist that purport to show that relationships with large age gaps are doomed.

trident765 · 2022-08-09T16:49:57+00:00

My view is the opposite of yours. I think teenagers should only be allowed to have sex with adults, and be banned from having sex with other teenagers. High schoolers having sex with each other is degenerate. But if a high school girl gets married to a grown man with a stable job, this is likely to result in them starting a stable family.

trident765 · 2022-08-09T15:36:40+00:00

I think even repealing the age of consent altogether would be better than the current system. If she is really young, you could just try to justify in court that she was too young to consent, just by demonstrating her immaturity in front of the court rather than appealing to an age number. No need for a hard one size fits all age. If one exists, it should be an age when they definitely cannot consent - see my 3rd point in the OP.

trident765 · 2022-08-09T12:08:59+00:00

I will speak in a language you can understand: Correlation does not imply causation. Modern technology is not a product of modern Western culture. Modern technology is a product of the deeply religious culture of the West before 1900.

trident765 · 2022-08-09T12:02:56+00:00

Stop gatekeeping you collectivist fag. There are incel wikis with articles people made about me. I created r/truecels in early 2016 which was the original incel sub on reddit. It had 2000 subscribers when it was banned and it was banned at a time when then number of subscribers was skyrocketing. My 2nd mod was keeping r/incels as a backup, which had less then 10 subscribers before r/truecels was banned, and then after the ban the community migrated to the backup sub r/incels, which gained 50,000 subscribers and made "incel" a household term. What did you do to contribute to the incel movement? Absolutely fucking nothing. You are just a wannabe tyrant who is seeking to gain some status in an already existing community by gatekeeping. You are the lowest form of scum.

trident765 · 2022-08-09T11:45:02+00:00

Spain only recently raised their age of consent to 16 and that was because research showed the majority of relationships girls under 16 were having with older men were abusive.

If cultural studies worked, then western countries wouldn't have a culture that was total shit.

trident765 · 2022-08-09T07:03:46+00:00

But either way - sex of kids should be shamed and penalized and all women or rather girls should be shamed for opening legs that early.

Maybe 50 years ago what you say had some validity, but today this point is no longer valid. The fate of a woman is the same whether she loses her virginity at 15 or 18: She will be a slut. Attempting to delay the age she loses her virginity will do absolutely nothing. The only thing that matters is for a woman to remain a virgin until her wedding day, but in today's world there is a 0% chance of that happening. In any case, age of consent is not the right tool for dealing with this issue.

trident765 · 2022-08-09T04:36:40+00:00

What's your policy on women/ gf-havers?

No policy, because policies against these often get ridiculous. Do you ban someone for having a "gf" in kindergarten? Do you ban someone for seeing a prostitute?

But at the same time users should be free to call out fakecels. Precursors to incel websites like SocialAnxietySupport were a cesspool because women would make posts like "my boyfriend helps me through my social anxiety", and when posters would call them out as fakes they would get banned.

trident765 · 2022-08-09T04:25:01+00:00

This is why the age of consent is so high. Because anyone who tries to defend a reasonable age of consent will get called names.

trident765 · 2022-08-09T04:23:02+00:00

Even if this were a bad thing, most 16-19 year olds don't want to have sex with older men anyway, so it is a non-issue.

trident765 · 2022-08-08T08:34:18+00:00

I do not see it. You are purposely being difficult because you do not want to discuss, you want to win, so I am done talking to you.

trident765 · 2022-08-08T08:29:35+00:00

Of course I know, but it is a poorly defined term. In order to discuss you need to be specific.

trident765 · 2022-08-08T02:11:35+00:00

Please speak English. What do you mean by "bluepill"?

trident765 · 2022-08-08T01:17:39+00:00

What will make the way this subreddit is moderated different from the way s/Incels is moderated is that I will not ban people simply because I disagree with their posts. Unlike u/ClownWorld123, I recognize that the "ban user" button is not a downvote button.

trident765 · 2022-08-08T00:15:45+00:00

Why?

trident765 · 2022-08-08T00:12:08+00:00

Please link to your answer.

trident765 · 2022-08-07T17:20:50+00:00

Ok it sounds like you are an idolator who accepts this modern western principle of "pedophiles are bad" as an axiom, without thinking critically about why it is that it is bad. Past cultures married off teen girls to older men all the time, and this never caused any societal problems. But you likely don't care because this goes against your culture's values, and you identify with your culture too strongly to question its values. You accept your culture's values for the sake of them being your culture's values.

I dunno who that eejit is

He is the father of science as we know it.

trident765 · 2022-08-07T16:48:58+00:00

A man (or a woman) who has sex with a teenager is always fucked in the head, no matter what kind of job he has.

Sir Francis Bacon married and had sex with a 14 year old girl when he was in his 40s. Was he fucked in the head?

trident765 · 2022-08-07T16:00:01+00:00

No one is answering my question of why it is better for 12 year olds to have sex with each other instead of adults. If a 12 year old girl has sex with a guy her own age, it will be some early-developing thug. This is even worse than having sex with an adult. Having a stable job should be a prerequisite for a man to have sex, but people like you want only early-maturing r-selected teenage thugs to have sexual access to teenage girls.

trident765 · 2022-08-07T06:38:12+00:00

Ok then just respond to my original comment. I don't care about the categories you learned in your gay high school class:

You stupid idealist, a high age of consent will do nothing to prevent 12 year olds from having sex. It will only lower the age of the people they have sex with. The question you need to answer is: Why is it better for teenagers to have sex with other teenagers instead of adults?

trident765 · 2022-08-07T02:25:34+00:00

Do you believe a high age of consent will prevent teenagers from having sex with each other?

trident765 · 2022-08-07T00:47:49+00:00

12 is too young for any sexual activity, and you should know better.

You stupid idealist, a high age of consent will do nothing to prevent 12 year olds from having sex. It will only lower the age of the people they have sex with. The question you need to answer is: Why is it better for teenagers to have sex with other teenagers instead of adults?

trident765 · 2022-08-06T23:42:15+00:00

The question of age of consent is not about whether it is good for people that age to have sex. It's a question of "If a 12 year old girl has sex with a grown man, is it her fault or was she a victim of child abuse". I think at 12 she knows what she is doing, and if she is going to sleep around at 12 she will sleep around at 18.

Also, if you make it illegal for a 12 year old girl to have sex with grown men, boys her own age can still have sex with her. How is this any better than a grown man having sex with her?

trident765 · 2022-08-05T21:31:43+00:00

I don't have the "Photos" program

trident765 · 2022-08-03T21:32:36+00:00

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/R/K_selection_theory

trident765 · 2022-08-02T18:21:22+00:00

This was the comment that got me banned:

https://saidit.net/s/Incels/comments/9kr5/football/ywoo

trident765 · 2022-08-02T17:24:38+00:00

They banned me too:

https://i.imgur.com/ZtZzeBw.png

I thought Saidit was supposed to be against this kind of arbitrary banning.

trident765 · 2022-08-02T17:21:58+00:00

I need to know this too. I got banned from s/Incels for saying "I see short Mexican guys with attractive girlfriends all the time"

trident765 · 2022-08-02T16:46:56+00:00

I see short Mexican guys with attractive girlfriends all the time

trident765 · 2022-08-01T17:46:59+00:00

The moving air dramatically cools the temperature,

Movement of air does not cool. Displacing the surrounding warm air does. But I have never felt that the air surrounding a hot car is especially warmer than the atmosphere.

and even opening the door lets out a lot of heat.

When someone leaves their kid/pet in a hot car, they have to open the door to get out. So it isn't any different.

trident765 · 2022-07-31T20:53:42+00:00

One of the good things about the last place I lived in is that prostitution was relatively easy to come by. This is why I have some hope for the liberal bureaucratic hellholes of the world. They are too inefficient to enforce their complicated laws so we see robust black markets emerge. This is why I think the nonmoronic revolution might start with nonmorons moving to a major liberal city, and living symbiotically with the black market thugs.

trident765

MODERATOR OF