Am I a psychopathic authoritarian asshole? by trident765 in nonmorons

[–]trident765[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The walls are so thin here that last night I could hear a young woman next door trying but failing to contain her moans while she was getting fucked by a Chad. This was actually one of the things that pushed me over the edge, because whether the tenant was the slut or the Chad, the fact that the tenant was having sex in modern culture means the tenant must be scum. Then I figured that since the tenant is scum, the reason they are letting their dog bark like this is probably purely because they are extremely inconsiderate. So in an impulsive fit of rage I contacted the apartment complex. I was planning on leaving a note on their door, but these are the thoughts that made me change my mind.

Am I a psychopathic authoritarian asshole? by trident765 in nonmorons

[–]trident765[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I agree.

Does this disprove the idea that American women are attracted to stupid losers? by trident765 in RealIncels

[–]trident765[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Because it shows that single adults are less educated, less likely to be employed, make less income. If women were attracted to stupid losers, then the charts would show that all the partnered men are on welfare.

The Trump Raid Happened Because We're Back to the IQ of 1700 by fschmidt in nonmorons

[–]trident765 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

How can the IQ of 1700 be like that of today? Francis Bacon lived before then, and he is in my opinion the greatest genius to have ever existed in history. Does anyone alive today come close to rivalling Francis Bacon's intelligence? Does anyone come close to rivalling Isaac Newton's intelligence? Does anyone come close to rivalling Bach's intelligence?

Thoughts on interview questions by trident765 in programming

[–]trident765[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

This gives me some comfort. I hope what you are saying is true.

Thoughts on interview questions by trident765 in programming

[–]trident765[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I didn't ask a question because they loved him too much and I didn't want to spoil their fun. It looks like he is going to be offered the job.

Of course all this depends on to what degree your teammates are modern scum.

I think they are non-scum, but they are naive non-scum. They have good values, write good software, but they fell for this guy who I strongly suspect has values that are contrary to theirs, because they fell for his charisma and virtue signaling (for example, he kept mentioning how he was a "proud new dad" and included photos of his infant kids in his presentation and his resume).

In the panel interview someone asked him a question similar to the question about teams, and he responded saying he prefers software development to be "dynamic" (by the way, modern scum love using vaguely defined words) and I think by this he meant that multiple people contribute to a software because afterwards he made a joke about how he gets overwhelmed when he is solely responsible for a software. One of the people on the panel who especially loved this guy said "that's great we do that here too! We each have our own projects we are responsible for, and then every once in a while we work together on the things that overlap". Basically he "corrected" the answer for him, and moved on. He didn't dig deeper, or ask him to clarify what he meant by "dynamic", because he liked his charisma so much that he was almost afraid of prying more, for fear of finding out something that would hurt his candidacy.

When I submitted my review of the candidate, I said that I was impressed by his presentation and experience, but that I felt like I knew very little about his personality, because the panel did not ask him any concrete questions about situations in the workplace, and I recommended for the next panel to ask more personality questions. Even by leaving this I felt like I was being too critical, because of how much everyone else loved him.

I think it is horrible that my teammates allowed themselves to be disarmed by this guy's public speaking skills. Just because someone is good at public speaking doesn't mean he will be a pleasant person to work with. They should have reflected on their values prior to the interview, and then asked questions to make sure the candidate's values were values that they found tolerable. But they liked his public speaking skills so they just assumed his values were good and gave him a "freebie" in that aspect of the interview.

Thoughts on interview questions by trident765 in programming

[–]trident765[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I sat through the interview I confirm he is 100% a modern scum. He even had a psychopathic gaze, and he was charming and charismatic. All my teammates loved him. I felt bad about the idea of asking a difficult question because they loved him so much, and I didn't want to be seen as negative by being the only person to ask a negative question. So I remained silent and did not ask my question, even when I was asked. He breezed through the interview and no one asked him any difficult questions, like they asked me when I had my interview. They just assumed he was a good guy because he was charismatic. The team members were so impressed by his charisma that the interview was more about impressing him than about vetting him.

They haven't discussed him yet, but I think it is 100% settled that he will be offered the job. My teammates just loved him too much. I regret so much that I did not ask my question. I want to cry.

Would you ever ask random foids for hugs? by IndianaJones in RealIncels

[–]trident765 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Why? A hug just leaves you feeling more unsatisfied.

For me, I just started seeing prostitutes when I was 26. My last city had a booming red light district so it was easy to find prostitutes that way. Unfortunately in my current city the police crack down pretty hard on prostitution, so the scene here sucks, so I don't see prostitutes any more.

I highly recommend prostitutes if you have no chance of getting into a relationship. I felt a million times better after losing my virginity. I was becoming extremely depressed and then losing my virginity cured me. There is still something missing, but life after prostitutes is much better than life before. I felt awesome the first time, like I found the cheat code to life.

An age of consent of 16 or higher is ridiculous by trident765 in whatever

[–]trident765[S] 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

You seem incapable of thinking broadly. You answer the specific comment, but your comments are inconsistent with each other. For example, in one comment you appeal to statistics, and when I doubted the utility of statistics, you say statistics don't matter and start making some tangential argument that has nothing to do with the original point I made. You are a task-oriented thinker.

An age of consent of 16 or higher is ridiculous by trident765 in whatever

[–]trident765[S] 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

What is your view? Do you even have one? You seem to keep changing direction in order to negate my comments.

An age of consent of 16 or higher is ridiculous by trident765 in whatever

[–]trident765[S] 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

A few centuries ago marriages between older men and teen girls were common, just browse Wikipedia articles of random famous people born in the Renaissance. Marriages from this time period were stabler than those of today. I am going to trust this over some "statistics" published by some blue haired feminist that purport to show that relationships with large age gaps are doomed.

An age of consent of 16 or higher is ridiculous by trident765 in whatever

[–]trident765[S] 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

My view is the opposite of yours. I think teenagers should only be allowed to have sex with adults, and be banned from having sex with other teenagers. High schoolers having sex with each other is degenerate. But if a high school girl gets married to a grown man with a stable job, this is likely to result in them starting a stable family.

An age of consent of 16 or higher is ridiculous by trident765 in whatever

[–]trident765[S] 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

I think even repealing the age of consent altogether would be better than the current system. If she is really young, you could just try to justify in court that she was too young to consent, just by demonstrating her immaturity in front of the court rather than appealing to an age number. No need for a hard one size fits all age. If one exists, it should be an age when they definitely cannot consent - see my 3rd point in the OP.

An age of consent of 16 or higher is ridiculous by trident765 in whatever

[–]trident765[S] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

I will speak in a language you can understand: Correlation does not imply causation. Modern technology is not a product of modern Western culture. Modern technology is a product of the deeply religious culture of the West before 1900.

What will your moderation policy be? by greybeard in RealIncels

[–]trident765 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Stop gatekeeping you collectivist fag. There are incel wikis with articles people made about me. I created r/truecels in early 2016 which was the original incel sub on reddit. It had 2000 subscribers when it was banned and it was banned at a time when then number of subscribers was skyrocketing. My 2nd mod was keeping r/incels as a backup, which had less then 10 subscribers before r/truecels was banned, and then after the ban the community migrated to the backup sub r/incels, which gained 50,000 subscribers and made "incel" a household term. What did you do to contribute to the incel movement? Absolutely fucking nothing. You are just a wannabe tyrant who is seeking to gain some status in an already existing community by gatekeeping. You are the lowest form of scum.

An age of consent of 16 or higher is ridiculous by trident765 in whatever

[–]trident765[S] 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

Spain only recently raised their age of consent to 16 and that was because research showed the majority of relationships girls under 16 were having with older men were abusive.

If cultural studies worked, then western countries wouldn't have a culture that was total shit.

An age of consent of 16 or higher is ridiculous by trident765 in whatever

[–]trident765[S] 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

But either way - sex of kids should be shamed and penalized and all women or rather girls should be shamed for opening legs that early.

Maybe 50 years ago what you say had some validity, but today this point is no longer valid. The fate of a woman is the same whether she loses her virginity at 15 or 18: She will be a slut. Attempting to delay the age she loses her virginity will do absolutely nothing. The only thing that matters is for a woman to remain a virgin until her wedding day, but in today's world there is a 0% chance of that happening. In any case, age of consent is not the right tool for dealing with this issue.

What will your moderation policy be? by greybeard in RealIncels

[–]trident765 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

What's your policy on women/ gf-havers?

No policy, because policies against these often get ridiculous. Do you ban someone for having a "gf" in kindergarten? Do you ban someone for seeing a prostitute?

But at the same time users should be free to call out fakecels. Precursors to incel websites like SocialAnxietySupport were a cesspool because women would make posts like "my boyfriend helps me through my social anxiety", and when posters would call them out as fakes they would get banned.

New Zealand Judge Declares 12-Year-Old Children Can Consent To Sex With Adults by ROSS921 in conspiracy

[–]trident765 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

This is why the age of consent is so high. Because anyone who tries to defend a reasonable age of consent will get called names.

New Zealand Judge Declares 12-Year-Old Children Can Consent To Sex With Adults by ROSS921 in conspiracy

[–]trident765 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Even if this were a bad thing, most 16-19 year olds don't want to have sex with older men anyway, so it is a non-issue.

New Zealand Judge Declares 12-Year-Old Children Can Consent To Sex With Adults by ROSS921 in conspiracy

[–]trident765 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I do not see it. You are purposely being difficult because you do not want to discuss, you want to win, so I am done talking to you.

What will your moderation policy be? by greybeard in RealIncels

[–]trident765 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Of course I know, but it is a poorly defined term. In order to discuss you need to be specific.

What will your moderation policy be? by greybeard in RealIncels

[–]trident765 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Please speak English. What do you mean by "bluepill"?

What will your moderation policy be? by greybeard in RealIncels

[–]trident765 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

What will make the way this subreddit is moderated different from the way s/Incels is moderated is that I will not ban people simply because I disagree with their posts. Unlike u/ClownWorld123, I recognize that the "ban user" button is not a downvote button.

New Zealand Judge Declares 12-Year-Old Children Can Consent To Sex With Adults by ROSS921 in conspiracy

[–]trident765 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Why?

New Zealand Judge Declares 12-Year-Old Children Can Consent To Sex With Adults by ROSS921 in conspiracy

[–]trident765 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Please link to your answer.

New Zealand Judge Declares 12-Year-Old Children Can Consent To Sex With Adults by ROSS921 in conspiracy

[–]trident765 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Ok it sounds like you are an idolator who accepts this modern western principle of "pedophiles are bad" as an axiom, without thinking critically about why it is that it is bad. Past cultures married off teen girls to older men all the time, and this never caused any societal problems. But you likely don't care because this goes against your culture's values, and you identify with your culture too strongly to question its values. You accept your culture's values for the sake of them being your culture's values.

I dunno who that eejit is

He is the father of science as we know it.

New Zealand Judge Declares 12-Year-Old Children Can Consent To Sex With Adults by ROSS921 in conspiracy

[–]trident765 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

A man (or a woman) who has sex with a teenager is always fucked in the head, no matter what kind of job he has.

Sir Francis Bacon married and had sex with a 14 year old girl when he was in his 40s. Was he fucked in the head?

New Zealand Judge Declares 12-Year-Old Children Can Consent To Sex With Adults by ROSS921 in conspiracy

[–]trident765 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

No one is answering my question of why it is better for 12 year olds to have sex with each other instead of adults. If a 12 year old girl has sex with a guy her own age, it will be some early-developing thug. This is even worse than having sex with an adult. Having a stable job should be a prerequisite for a man to have sex, but people like you want only early-maturing r-selected teenage thugs to have sexual access to teenage girls.

New Zealand Judge Declares 12-Year-Old Children Can Consent To Sex With Adults by ROSS921 in conspiracy

[–]trident765 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Ok then just respond to my original comment. I don't care about the categories you learned in your gay high school class:

You stupid idealist, a high age of consent will do nothing to prevent 12 year olds from having sex. It will only lower the age of the people they have sex with. The question you need to answer is: Why is it better for teenagers to have sex with other teenagers instead of adults?

New Zealand Judge Declares 12-Year-Old Children Can Consent To Sex With Adults by ROSS921 in conspiracy

[–]trident765 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Do you believe a high age of consent will prevent teenagers from having sex with each other?

New Zealand Judge Declares 12-Year-Old Children Can Consent To Sex With Adults by ROSS921 in conspiracy

[–]trident765 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

12 is too young for any sexual activity, and you should know better.

You stupid idealist, a high age of consent will do nothing to prevent 12 year olds from having sex. It will only lower the age of the people they have sex with. The question you need to answer is: Why is it better for teenagers to have sex with other teenagers instead of adults?

New Zealand Judge Declares 12-Year-Old Children Can Consent To Sex With Adults by ROSS921 in conspiracy

[–]trident765 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

The question of age of consent is not about whether it is good for people that age to have sex. It's a question of "If a 12 year old girl has sex with a grown man, is it her fault or was she a victim of child abuse". I think at 12 she knows what she is doing, and if she is going to sleep around at 12 she will sleep around at 18.

Also, if you make it illegal for a 12 year old girl to have sex with grown men, boys her own age can still have sex with her. How is this any better than a grown man having sex with her?

There is no image viewer in Windows 10 by trident765 in nonmorons

[–]trident765[S] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

I don't have the "Photos" program

Fuck s/Incels mods for banning me for no reason by yabbit in whatever

[–]trident765 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

This was the comment that got me banned:

https://saidit.net/s/Incels/comments/9kr5/football/ywoo

Fuck s/Incels mods for banning me for no reason by yabbit in whatever

[–]trident765 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

They banned me too:

https://i.imgur.com/ZtZzeBw.png

I thought Saidit was supposed to be against this kind of arbitrary banning.

How do you appeal a ban? by yabbit in help

[–]trident765 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I need to know this too. I got banned from s/Incels for saying "I see short Mexican guys with attractive girlfriends all the time"

Football by trident765 in Incels

[–]trident765[S] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

I see short Mexican guys with attractive girlfriends all the time

Is the thing about hot cars being exceptionally deadly a myth? by trident765 in Physics

[–]trident765[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The moving air dramatically cools the temperature,

Movement of air does not cool. Displacing the surrounding warm air does. But I have never felt that the air surrounding a hot car is especially warmer than the atmosphere.

and even opening the door lets out a lot of heat.

When someone leaves their kid/pet in a hot car, they have to open the door to get out. So it isn't any different.

Prostitution is victimless, sluttiness is not by fschmidt in nonmorons

[–]trident765 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

One of the good things about the last place I lived in is that prostitution was relatively easy to come by. This is why I have some hope for the liberal bureaucratic hellholes of the world. They are too inefficient to enforce their complicated laws so we see robust black markets emerge. This is why I think the nonmoronic revolution might start with nonmorons moving to a major liberal city, and living symbiotically with the black market thugs.

Do you think I'll ever get a girlfriend? by yabbit in AskSaidIt

[–]trident765 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Tinder didn't work for me when I tried it 4 years ago. The algorithm figured out I wasn't "hot" and stopped showing my profile to women.

Is it a coincidence that the modern Sodom and Gomorrah (San Francisco) is in an area with a lot of seismic activity? by trident765 in nonmorons

[–]trident765[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Part of not being a moron is recognizing the limits of human intellect. It is like a dog with a shock collar. A dog does not understand how a shock collar works, but an intelligent dog can at least understand that if he stops barking he stops getting shocked. The point is that just because you don't understand the mechanism that degeneracy can trigger a volcanic eruption does not mean it doesn't exist. The Bible tells a story of how degenerate cities were destroyed by fire and brimstone. Another example is the degenerate city of Pompeii which was completely destroyed by a volcanic eruption. And today it looks like San Francisco, which is the most degenerate city in the world, has set itself up to be the next city to be destroyed in this way.

My nightmare last night by fschmidt in nonmorons

[–]trident765 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I could see this really happening at some point. Android phones already removed the "undo" feature. And deleting the backspace key is something that would be easy to justify using the sophistry tactics programmer scum already use. If anything the user did at all contributes to the problem in the smallest way, programmer will jump on it and blame the user.

Imagine you make a ticket on their online system saying there is no backspace key. They ask you what you need the backspace key for. And then after you say it is because you want to correct a typo, they close the ticket because you admitted the problem was due to user error and not due to their software.

Elliot Rodger on Women by trident765 in nonmorons

[–]trident765[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

It is stronger, but it has both a positive and a negative component. Men don't get repulsed by unattractive women the same way that women get repulsed by unattractive women.

You have to remember that women are creatures whose existence revolves around sex and reproduction, so their sensations with respect to sex are going to be stronger and more acute.

Interview question to weed out modern scum? by trident765 in programming

[–]trident765[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

When the modern scum took over my department at my last workplace, one of the first things the head scum did was he held a meeting where he said that from now on, for any project that anyone wants to work on that has an estimated timeframe of more than a half-day, we need to submit a written request to form a "team" for the project, which needs to be approved by him. In the meeting I asked if some "teams" might consist of only one person. Then one of the head scum's henchmen responded saying that his feeling would be no, because all work is better when done collaboratively. Then the head scum responded saying that he agrees with the henchman scum.

Then a month later, when they shut down my project, the main reason they gave was that my code was bad because it wasn't written collaboratively.

Interview question to weed out modern scum? by trident765 in programming

[–]trident765[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I think I thought of a good question.

Most members of my group more or less have a specific domain they are responsible. One person is responsible for software A, another for software B, etc. I think they like this model, because it gives them the opportunity to become subject matter experts in their own domain. But modern scum are absolutely revolted by this idea. They believe that instead everyone should have equal ownership of every software. So I can capitalize on this to get modern scum candidates to give an answer my group members won't like.

My question will be: "Do you prefer a model where each person is responsible for a particular software, or do you prefer a more collaborative model where everyone works together on every software". If he is a modern scum, he will say he likes the collaborative way better, and I think this will make my team mates dislike him.

modern javascript by fschmidt in programming

[–]trident765 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The functions should just be given names and then async.parallel can be called in a single line.

Interview question to weed out modern scum? by trident765 in programming

[–]trident765[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

In the interview, I suggest asking the applicant to name something he doesn't like about a standard library and how he would change it. This should be a topic that everyone can follow. If he is modern scum then he will come up with something absurd and you should be able to verbally destroy him.

But if he is a modern scum, won't he agree with all the horrible libraries he uses? Modern scum follow trends, so they will appreciate something standard for the sake of being standard. Standard means that everyone uses it.

Interview question to weed out modern scum? by trident765 in programming

[–]trident765[S] 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Silicon valley psychopathic programmer scum. They smile, act friendly, say certain phrases like "Hey there stranger", but in reality they are nasty evil assholes, who will stab you in the back, are communist, ban you from forums, force you to do pointless crap, and like to impose complicated unusable software on people. They are truly the most vile people on earth.

modern javascript by fschmidt in programming

[–]trident765 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Modern scum seem to derive extreme pleasure from being presented with features that have a very narrow set of applications. The second way may save a few characters of typing in one of the rare cases where the function only needs to be one line, which I imagine is why modern scum love it. They like the idea that there is a designated feature for writing one-line functions.

BBCode vs Markdown by fschmidt in FreedIt

[–]trident765 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Markdown can be annoying because often when you enter regular text it interprets it as formatting. For example, when I made this post, where I copy/pasted from a book:

https://old.reddit.com/r/BAYAN/comments/vsku1e/bayani_view_of_12_imams/if9qnp5/

it initially interpreted the carets (^) as superscripts, so I had to go through my post and escape them.

Also, markdown sometimes does this stupid autonumbering thing, where it changes numbers you typed into numbers that it thinks that you should have typed. For example:

I typed 3,4,5, but it renders it as 1,2,3 for some retarded reason.

With BBCode, all the automatic stuff is in tags so you won't get this annoying behavior without asking for it.

Modern campaign ad for state senate by fschmidt in nonmorons

[–]trident765 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

This is what you have to do to win impulsive people's votes.

The most stupid feature by trident765 in programming

[–]trident765[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Ubuntu Linux. Ext4.

phpBB banned me from their test forum by fschmidt in nonmorons

[–]trident765 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

You can tell from their posts that the mods are tyrants:

https://www.phpbb.com/community/viewtopic.php?t=2608901

By the way, that mod is a transgender.

Genius study suggests that being a fat diesel dyke slob means you probably don't care as much about your looks as a straight chick does. by hfxB0oyA in news

[–]trident765 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

Yeah it is pretty funny

San Francisco's Lowell High School Returns to Merit-Based Admissions After Lottery System Was a Disaster by [deleted] in news

[–]trident765 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I do think there should be some kind of small-scale lottery, in order to promote diversity (not just in the liberal sense).