you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]oofreesouloo 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Gender =/= gender roles. I don't know why you and radical feminists insist on calling gender as if it was a synonym for gender roles. Gender, before this TQ+ gender ideology, was considered a synonym for SEX and used interchangeably. You mean gender roles.

[–]dontbuyanylogos[S] 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

if you agree that gender roles are a social construct then we agree but we just disagree on the terms

[–]BiHorror 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Not even "gender roles," but sex roles and sex stereotypes. Like, i get it but from all the people they could've built their stuff on... It had to be John Money? The discredited pedo who literally based his works off an child abusing experiment that failed for obvious reasons???

I'm at the point where we just drop the word altogether. It has become too corrupted. Gender roles? Gender stereotypes? Gender equality? Just replace all with sex. It's more to the point, in your face (tras* face), and within context.