Human beats IBM's AI in debate competition
submitted 1 year ago by Vigte from (youtube.com)
view the rest of the comments →
[–]Alduin 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun - 1 year ago (1 child)
That's cool. Here's the actual debate in case anyone is interested:
[–]wizzwizz4 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - 1 year ago* (0 children)
Actual debate starts at 11:15. Second round starts at 24:22, and from it I observe that Project Debater's main issue is not being able to understand what Harish Natarajan was saying. This lead to its stunningly-well researched, persuasive argument being construed as out of touch. Third round starts at 37:30, and Project Debater does very well to pick out something that Harish Natarajan actually sort of addressed, but because he was using the words "subsidy for the middle class" she didn't realise that that was referring to the subsidy for the pre-schools in a pejorative fashion. Thus, she thought that all of his arguments were criticising pre-schools, and ended up arguing for his point in the third part. Harish Natarajan picked up on that! Wooo! (applause) He also noted what kind of language that Project Debater didn't understand, and picked up on that, and used it further.
use the following search parameters to narrow your results:
e.g. sub:pics site:imgur.com dog
sub:pics site:imgur.com dog
advanced search: by author, sub...
~2 users here now
Technology and related articles and discussion