What's wrong with Intel: Former principal engineer unloads
submitted 3 years ago by [deleted] from (pcworld.com)
view the rest of the comments →
[–][deleted] 6 insightful - 4 fun6 insightful - 3 fun7 insightful - 3 fun7 insightful - 4 fun - 3 years ago (2 children)
too much planned obsolescence.
[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun - 3 years ago (1 child)
I don't think Intel planned for their fab process to become obsolete. They just never addressed it properly and now are four years behind their schedule of moving from 14nm to 10nm. Put bean counters in charge and this is what happens.
[–][deleted] 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun - 3 years ago (0 children)
we would be way further along with technology if not for this shit. It's funny to act like the CEO of Intel can't easily get on the phone and call the CEO of AMD and agree to collude. There's no reason for them to improve the technology.
use the following search parameters to narrow your results:
e.g. sub:pics site:imgur.com dog
sub:pics site:imgur.com dog
advanced search: by author, sub...
~2 users here now
Technology and related articles and discussion
view the rest of the comments →
[–][deleted] 6 insightful - 4 fun6 insightful - 3 fun7 insightful - 3 fun7 insightful - 4 fun - (2 children)
[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun - (1 child)
[–][deleted] 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun - (0 children)