Can cosmic inflation be ruled out?

submitted by JasonCarswell from (phys.org)

all 7 comments
sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun

[–]zyxzevn 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Yes. There is no inflation.

The cosmic background radiation is related to water. It is the black body of water in the radio frequencies, caused by weak bonds between the dipole molecules. Skyscholar has a huge list of videos on the bad science of the background radiation. He is an expert in radio-measuring devices.

The redshift is caused by plasma. It is a side-effect like the dielectric effect, but very weak. It is still being researched. Seems related to free electrons.
The well known redshift variations show cloudlike features, they call it dark energy instead of plasma
There are also some high redshift objects in front of low redshift galaxies. This seems to be related to the electrical activity in the galaxies, which again increases the amount of free electrons and free ions in the plasma.

[–]chadwickofwv 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

I see you are familiar with the electric universe theory.

[–]zyxzevn 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

There are several versions of electrical universe theories. And also there are different plasma cosmology theories.
|t is almost as if each scientist develops his own alternative theory.
Personally, I try to stay focused on the available evidence.

[–]Canbot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

The fact that you need to completely disregard the laws of physics to make the big bang theory work makes it a religion and not a science.

Without the laws of physics we have nothing. You can literally make up anything you want. Why not choose a better religion with a kind god?

[–]JasonCarswell[S] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

Why not choose a better religion with a kind god?

If you're going to be delusional, why not just believe you are God?

We don't to add complexity to our existence with myths that are invisible, can't be proven, won't communicate clearly and concisely despite being "all powerful", and don't exist. Believing in higher authority is the essence of politics and the foundations of all the worst problems of our world.

Also, simulation theory makes as much sense as anything, if you need another thing to try to believe.

We must realize we'll never comprehend everything in this cosmos with our human brains.

[–]Canbot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

If you're going to be delusional, why not just believe you are God?

Because if you are god there is no one to save you, protect you, make things work out, know more than you, have a plan, etc. A kind god gives you hope when you are hopeless, a reason to be kind when all you feel is hate, a reason to live when you are lost, a reason to strive to be good when you are only self interested.

Jordan peterson has a good take on god if you have an IQ over 130 to understand what he is saying. I find that most seemingly intelligent people take what he says too literally or can't keep the 20 things he says in mind long enough to put together the point he is making. It sounds like he goes on many tangents, but he is putting together a lot of pieces that fit into a picture.

We don't to add complexity to our existence with myths

If you believe in the big bang than you do, that is the point. And frankly there is always something everyone has that fits that discription. Everyone believes in something they have no proof of. Most people are just sheep and think if the news said it is science than it must be true. But still they believe without proof. Without understanding. They only "know" it is true because the news told them it is true. Their higher authority is literally a propaganda machine directed by the most immoral people alive. God is a much better alternative.

Also, simulation theory makes as much sense as anything

It does not, and is not really any different than thinking you are god. Unless your version of simulation theory is that despite knowing it is a simulatuon you still cant effect it in any way, in which case it is not any different than if there is no simulation. Except it implies that there is a greater being that created the simulation, is watching the results, and presumably can change outcomes at will. In which case you are back to god.

We must realize we'll never comprehend everything in this cosmos with our human brains.

Of course, only god can understand everything. Don't you worry your little head about all the contradictions.

[–]IkeConn 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

You don't know. You weren't there.