you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]FormosaOolong 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

And fuck the writer for slipping in that the human effect is "controversial". It's only "controversial" bc Monsant/Bayer won't admit it.

[–]i_cansmellthat 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

It appears that other agencies won't admit it either, agencies that when scrutinized have ties to Monsanto. Magnora7 linked a chart in his comment.

The Monsanto spokesperson also used the phrase "poses no unreasonable risk." Would love to have clarification as to what qualifies as "no unreasonable risk." He didn't say "no risk" though, did he?