you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Site_rly_sux 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (29 children)

Okay so either you're right and she used an archive pic to falsely persuade you that ruzzians shell kids.

Or, she's simply innocently mistaken about this photo, and the ruzzians DO shell kids.

So given that I have a year's worth of observations of Kramatorsk and Mariupol ...and all of the ruzzia's historical conduct of rape and destruction...which of these two things is going to be true. It's clearly not #1

[–]Dregan 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (28 children)

Yup its the first one. This move has been done many times putting out a false narrative. At some point it stops becoming a coincidence.

I've been following it for decades now and have gotten both sides of the story.

[–]Site_rly_sux 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (27 children)

Wow finally we have a long-term expert to explain....how is it that the russia magically prevent their artillery shells from hitting children and families? Finally, someone who claims to understand it enough to explain the propaganda lie

[–]Dregan 4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 3 fun -  (26 children)

What are u even talking about? Lol

They got caught lying again & again. Keep defending lies buddy. It's a good look 👌

[–]Site_rly_sux 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (25 children)

Oh - I thought earlier you said you were an expert and had been following things for a while.

The very simple question to you, is, how is it that the ruzzians prevent their artillery from hitting children and families. Earlier you waded into the discussion throwing your expertise around, so it should be easy for you to just explain what it is that Putin does to the artillery fire controls to make them avoid children and families.

After all, it doesn't happen, and that's why fakes like the OP were created out of a Spanish textbook cover. So please use your expertise to enlighten us

[–]Dregan 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (24 children)

How many times have they accused the Russians of firing missiles that have been proven to be Ukrainian/U.S?

Clearly u have no clue what your talking about there CNN.

[–]Site_rly_sux 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (23 children)

So your answer is that ruzzia is firing neither artillery nor missiles. Am I getting your expert take right: that the russian army has used neither artillery or missiles this year. Is that really your answer.

[–]Dregan 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (22 children)

What ITF does that have to do with this m.p lying and using stock photos as propaganda? The same tactic they have been busted for again and again.

Keep shilling for nazi's!

[–]Site_rly_sux 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (21 children)

Darn, when you waded in insisting you're this studied guy who knows all about the topic, I thought you'd be able to at least answer the very simple question.

If she had to use stock photography to fake that ruzzian weapons hit children....then how are the ruzzians in reality keeping their weapons from hitting children? She's having to resort to propaganda fakes to hide what's really an incredible truth: there's something miraculous about the weapons used in Ukraine that spares children. I thought, seeing as you're the long studied expert and all, you could explain a little more about that please

[–]Dregan 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (20 children)

Ask her why she chose to make up a story and steal a fake pic of child to further the propaganda.

Then ask them why they lie, make up stories and censor everything about the war.

Can u explain why u support neo nazi's?