you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]cat256 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

just checked it still backed those up? also if you know how to code you can find some repos on github that does this automatically on your machine while keep protesting about things like this. also wayback machine did far more good than harm and you can see they got sued pretty bad last year for keeping shit up and available on hackernews.

[–]LarrySwinger2 4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 3 fun -  (3 children)

Nobody's saying they're doing more harm than good. We all love archive.org. But it's worrisome if even that site has to start censoring.

[–]cat256 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

can you bring more examples though? like they run on a limited budget and one exception is not convincing.

[–]jamesK_3rd 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

One exception is not convincing?

I feel like this exception is pretty big. And the larger the budget, the more likely to be compromised it becomes.

I think when you become ok censuring one thing, it becomes very easy to censor many things.

[–]cat256 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

well it's hardly an exception first of. as of today they have the link, so you could just screenshot last week and post today and fake that. im not saying you did but that is doable. honestly, i don't think it's that big. it's there. they put it back up. just check.