you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]jet199 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

It doesn't really matter what she wrote.

For most women the choice is an economic one.

They can't afford to have kids on one salary.

They can't even afford to have kids on one good salary and one crap one.

So women have to work and they have to work their way up the greasy pole to get a good wage which means they don't have free time and aren't meeting as many people.

Otherwise the only answer is to throw yourself on the state and live on benefits. Then you can pop out as many kids as you want but it means your agency is taken away and you get less if your relationship is stable.

I mean most millennials won't ever be able to afford a house and of course kids cost a lot more. I doubt the younger generation are any better off. They are even more socially isolated.

I've even see old feminists say "while we were busy arguing about whether stay at home motherhood was good or bad the choice was removed out from under us."

[–]Chipit[S] 5 insightful - 4 fun5 insightful - 3 fun6 insightful - 4 fun -  (1 child)

It doesn't really matter what she wrote.

Sure it does. This was an evil woman, participating in an evil enterprise, designed to lure women away from a life that made them happy into a world of misery. It was on purpose and is well-supported by feminist literature.

"No woman should be authorized to stay at home to raise her children...because if there is such a choice, too many women will make that one."

-- French feminist Simone de Beauvoir

Just to prove what pieces of shit these feminists were, Simone de Beauvoir was known to groom young girls for Jean-Paul Sartre to abuse. Yeah, she pretty much had to write that strength comes from devotion because otherwise she couldn't mindfuck victims into compliance.

"They lived out their freedom in an open relationship, which included seducing, sharing and discarding young women, among them de Beauvoir's high-school students. This ill accords with her liberating feminist philosophy and fiction, and her acerbic analysis of how women are looked at and objectified, restricted to being the “other”. The revered existentialist couple would nowadays be accused of “grooming”."

Why does your comment read very much like you are defending this filth?

[–]Nayenezgani 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

They lived out their freedom in an open relationship, which included seducing, sharing and discarding young women, among them de Beauvoir's high-school students.

Funny because most feminists would do the exact opposite and claim that an old male dating any female under 30 is pedophilia.