Systemic Anti-White Bias in Western Media: A ton of evidence

submitted by [deleted] from thuletide.wordpress.com

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]magnora7 13 insightful - 4 fun13 insightful - 3 fun14 insightful - 4 fun -  (14 children)

Even this counter-reaction is itself a form of intended propaganda. This is divide-and-conquer in action. To make white people feel victimized and attacked, so that they might lash out.

Don't fall for the attack, or the counter-attack. It's a trick. This is not what life is about.

[–]VirgilGriff 10 insightful - 3 fun10 insightful - 2 fun11 insightful - 3 fun -  (13 children)

"We can attack you, and if you defend against it you're making the attack worse."

The first part to fixing a problem is to notice the problem and discuss it.

[–]magnora7 6 insightful - 7 fun6 insightful - 6 fun7 insightful - 7 fun -  (6 children)

My point is that the problem is manufactured and the problem isn't really real in the first place, and "fighting" it only gives it more energy, which is the intended effect. That's how divide-and-conquer works

[–][deleted] 8 insightful - 2 fun8 insightful - 1 fun9 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

The problem might be manufactured, but it's real. The statistics are real. Our people are suffering, our lands are being taken from us. Your solution to not fight back is cowardly at best, traitorous at worst.

[–]magnora7 2 insightful - 4 fun2 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 4 fun -  (1 child)

Everyone is suffering, the problem is they make you think "our people" are whites, instead of "our people" being everyone who isn't a billionaire (which is closer to the truth of who is being actually affected).

Thinking the divides are along race and gender, rather than who has the most money, is just a divide and conquer technique and it's best we not fall for it.

[–][deleted] 6 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

I don't like billionaires either, to be sure, but take billionaires out of the picture and the reality that the races, some more than others, are incompatible remains.

The fact that blacks rape 30,000+ white women and children in the US every year, and in the same timeframe whites rape 0 or close to 0 blacks, that isn't billionaire's doing, it's the blacks themselves who bring this violence and dysfunction to a formerly peaceful and prosperous civilization. I don't support genocide but it's clear that black people need their own spaces, far away from whites, for the benefit of everyone involved.

[–]milkmender11 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Your people who?

[–]VirgilGriff 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

How can one differentiate between an actual problem that's sowing discord (which implies it's worth fighting) and a manufactured one that's sowing discord (which implies that giving it attention makes it worse, and ignoring it may or may not make it better)?

It seems to me that much of this is a natural manifestation of years of SJW shit being pushed in multiple public spheres, and most recently is reflected by one of the two political parties buying into it hard. The only defense I've seen that's effective is to:

  1. Be able to speak freely about the problem (largely why I'm on Saidit and not Reddit right now, as it's impossible to have conversations on the latter)

  2. Discuss and spread the merits of individualism over collectivism, and especially to criticize neo-Marxism/cultural Marxism/any collectivist identity-based social theory.

Marxism is itself a bifurcated ideology, design to divide and conquer. Cultural Marxism is the best way to describe what's currently happening, I believe, where the proletariat and bourgeoisie are replaced by infinitely fractional "intersectional" subgroups, whose borders can be continually shifted so as to maximize the length of time it takes for people to lift the veil on the victim-based lie that they're being sold.

[–]magnora7 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

How can one differentiate between an actual problem that's sowing discord (which implies it's worth fighting) and a manufactured one that's sowing discord (which implies that giving it attention makes it worse, and ignoring it may or may not make it better)?

That's the million-dollar question, isn't it? If it were easy to distinguish the two, they wouldn't do it at all. That's kind of the whole trick in a nutshell. Strong logic is important, but so is knowing when someone is yanking your chain and having the ability to walk away.

[–]Jesus 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (5 children)

How about this... boycott all corporations that show anti-caucasian bias. Stop paying taxes that goes to war ammunitions and stop voting for Zionists. Imagine if everyone just boycotted these criminals? Boycotting criminality ahould be the goal and awareness.

You might want to close doen your bank account while your at it too. They are funding anti-caucasian movements as well.

[–]milkmender11 1 insightful - 3 fun1 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 3 fun -  (3 children)

Not to toss a wrench in your reasoning, but genetically speaking, Semites are Caucasian. If you choose to look at race that way, Zionists are just members of your tribe that have decided that you are too mixed/distantly related to be one of them. You're not so much a noble band of Caucasians resisting the evil Zionists, you are a jealous kid brother pecking at the coattails of your distant, dismissive sibling.

[–]Jesus 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

Stupid reasoning. Why add jealousy into all of this? That is what many Zionists do!

Ashkenazi Jews, the majority of them in the US who control much of the government are ASIATIC. They are not Caucasian; nor are they semitic.

Zionists can be of any race, even shabbos goys like Biden can be Zionists and admit that they are.

The point is Zionists follow the Synagogue of Satan which rejects Christ, YESHUA.

Lastly, Zionism IS A POLITICAL ISM. It is an ideology. Caucasians, Asiactics have all kinds of conflicting ideologies. What Zionists are is a cult, one that holds unto their Jewishness in "Christianity" like Michael Brown, who loves Trump, or is covertly an ethno-nationalist.

Zionism is one of terrorim. That is why they had to use Darby, Scofield as liasons to push Zionism unto meek Christians. It was always a terrorist project, against not only Palestinians but diaspora Jews" as well.

All reject Christ. All have the ability to follow him; they refuse.

[–]milkmender11 1 insightful - 3 fun1 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 3 fun -  (1 child)

Stupid reasoning. I cannot add anything that you already exhibit in abundance; it is already there. I can only point out its existence.

There is no race called "Asiatic." This term was invented specifically to ostracize Caucasian peoples who were perceived as inimical to or inferior to the largely Anglo-Saxon people who sought to distinguish themselves from other Caucasian groups. Actually, your argument is drawn directly from British physician William Lawrence, who likewise confabulated the Fins and Laplanders right out of the Caucasian category, handwaving them away without evidence as 'Asiatics' and subsequently corrected by Thomas Huxley. The exact same material you are citing was subsequently invoked by German eugenicists. You are cherrypicking a specific moment in racialist history that was rapidly debunked by other racialists. Modern genetic analyses, for what they are worth, establish the majority of what we call 'Jewish people' today as firmly Caucasian. This is a scientific reality. If you are a Caucasian, you are in the same racial group as the vast and overwhelming majority of Jewish people, albeit probably much more mixed than they are. I do have a brother so I know how vitriolic these sibling rivalries can be; as they say, "familiarity breeds contempt." It is your close familial link that has you so at odds with one another.

Semites, like the other peoples of the Mesopotamian region, are Caucasioid. In fact, 'Semite' refers to a linguistic group, not a genetic lineage. Semites are functionally indistinguishable from the other Caucasians of the region. 'Semite' is an academic term with a specific usage, and you have deviated from that usage here.

There is neither a Satan nor a Christ so I'll let you say whatever you like about that. I prefer to focus on the genetics. The fact remains that you cannot point to any genetic lineage or race and conflate them with Zionism or Semitism, without pointing to a Caucasian people. Your best fallback here is to run with the argument that Zionism is more of a philosophy with no genetic lineage behind it, you will get further with that. Honestly, your main mistake was invoking the 'Caucasian' category at all. There was never any chance you were going to win with that, not without throwing away the whole of modern ancestral analyses in favor of 1800s armchair racialism. Not even the neo-Nazis would have your back on this one.

I'm sure it was a fiery and passionate sermon that you got your information from, certainly something to behold. I am quite sympathetic to this, part of my job involves travelling around the world studying different religions. But parroting a sermon is not the same as hitting the books and having your facts straight.

[–]Jesus 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Semitic: ie. denoting a language of Hebrew and Arabic among other languages.

Zionism is what? Zionism denotes a land for Jews that was "occupied" by indigenous Palestinians. Zealotry under Rome by biblical Jews and high preists also used Zionist tendencies, such that "this is our land and our God, he has thus chosen us, and not you, to take land for ourselves."

This is a scientific reality. If you are a Caucasian, you are in the same racial group as the vast and overwhelming majority of Jewish people, albeit probably much more mixed than they are.

Very true, though, intermixture did occur. And the Asiatic race does exist.

Zionism can be thus criticised, as can Judaism and ethno-nationalism.

Can you provide me with some links debunking the Ashkenazi Khazar theory as well as the Asiactic race theory?

[–]VirgilGriff 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

That'd be great. But the first step to doing all that is to discuss it