you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]ActuallyNot[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

TIL, the white house is how we decide what is or is not discrimination.

You were talking about the current administration. I assumed you meant the white house.

Which administration were you talking about?

What a weasely way to completely avoid the topic

It's always projection.

The question you keep weasling out of was: "Where do you check to see the percentage of how ok it is?"

This is the third time I've asked.

[–]BobOki 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Your question is a straw man, why would anyone give any time or effort into a logical fallacy? If you have to use those, or usually shortly after ad hominen attacks, which you have not really done but just saying usually that is next, you lost the debate before it started. Do better.

[–]ActuallyNot[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Your question is a straw man, why would anyone give any time or effort into a logical fallacy?

Really. So when you said: "p.s. Last I checked it was 100% ok and encouraged by the current administration to discriminate against white males, so maybe stop spreading that hypocritical propaganda."

Where did you check, and how did you get the 100%?