Riddle me this: "Gun manufacturers are responsible for all instances of gun violence" BUT "vaccine manufacturers are not responsible if their product kills or injures someone"

submitted by Orangutan from (np.reddit.com)

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Noam_ChomskyPirate Party 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (6 children)

It's like a gun that could have blanks, or armor piercing rounds.

Also, there's no safety mechanism.

Also, the gun can spontaneously fire at any time after purchase.

Horror stories have been written about similar guns. It's rumored to have nano bots that may take control of your body.

You're not supposed to ask questions about the gun, and you can't work or travel in make places without the gun.

It's probably fine. Nothing to see.

[–][deleted] 4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 3 fun -  (1 child)

and also you're not allowed to sue the gun company. They have immunity.

[–]Noam_ChomskyPirate Party 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

They have immunity.

Ironic.

[–]60seconds 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

It's even worse when your vaccine has fires blanks

[–]Noam_ChomskyPirate Party 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

It's even worse when your vaccine has fires blanks

You're statement assumes the target is a pathogen, as conventional varieties are alleged to.

If that's true, then why modify the person's RNA?

Why not perform long term studies before modifying everyone. Everywhere.

[–]60seconds 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

I mean it would suck if you vaccine just had air in it

[–]Noam_ChomskyPirate Party 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

That's true.

Although, we do know how to treat that.