it's like the whole thing was staged or something

submitted by Orangutan from (i.redd.it)

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (10 children)

There are more than ten readers. Why do you comment on a site and belittle the userbase?

And to answer that question, because people like you will do just about anything for money.

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (9 children)

There are more than ten readers.

Good point. This thread has 30 upvotes. If half of them are human, there are, indeed, more than 10 readers. Only about 10 would have read the thread after I posted my comments though. Less in the case of this one.

Why do you comment on a site and belittle the userbase?

To point out that the people looking for shills here are not only dragging down the pyramid of debate, by reducing to ad-hom, but also an ad-hom that's obviously wrong.

And to answer that question, because people like you will do just about anything for money.

That's obviously wrong too. Why do you post stuff that blind freddy can see is wrong instead of engaging in the discussion.

And to answer that question, because people like you will do anything to avoid reality.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (8 children)

Blind Freddy can smell your BS too, in fact, he got a better whiff of it than I did.

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

If you think that something I've posted is wrong, please explain what and why you think that.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

I won't do that, I can't talk to someone when they've got their mind raptured by the mainstream.

You think everyone who reads a thing upvotes it? You think I don't see how you play with words? You can do that elsewhere, but if you try it here, you'll be called out. If you think you are virtuous for coming here and trying to spread the mainstream narrative, think again.

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

I won't do that, I can't talk to someone when they've got their mind raptured by the mainstream.

Well fuck off if you prefer.

You think everyone who reads a thing upvotes it?

Nope

You think I don't see how you play with words?

I don't know what you're talking about. And I know you're not going to explain. My best guess is that factual discussions give you cognitive dissonance. And by "play with words" you mean "discuss rationally".

You can do that elsewhere, but if you try it here, you'll be called out.

What by you saying "I'm not going to tell you what is BS, but it is"?

How called out I feel.

If you think you are virtuous for coming here and trying to spread the mainstream narrative, think again.

I think the same thing again. If you think lying to people even here is virtuous, consider your ethics.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

You've got quite the sophisticated algorithm.

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

You're dragging down the discussion on the Pyramid of Debate, by calling me a bot?

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

For what it's worth, the user you're responding to may seem to stalk you, try to find out more about you, and your responses to him will often receive replies that are illogical, hostile and based on false information. It'll be like an episode of the Twilight Zone.

[–]ActuallyNot 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

Cheers. Perhaps I should've just reported the comment, but I wanted to be sure that I'd parsed it correctly.