you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

There can be several forms of counterargument, none of which may be considered satisfactory. For example:

She and other politicians think of themselves as above the law and that the legislation they pass is not necessarily for themselves, but for others.

Also, she may not want to pay it.

Also she may plan to pay it, but hasn't bothered to think about it.

Also - because this is from a heavily biased source, it's likelly that they are not offering her point of view on this, or what she plans to do about it.

[–]Chipit[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Way to take the side of the powerful against the little guy! Punch down! Speak truth to the powerless!

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I am not taking Pelosi's side. I've also not bothered to see if there is any accuracy in this think that is only reported by Fox, and no one else seems to care. In fact, I would hope Pelosi focused on more important issues, as she sometimes fails to do and as AOC and others are very concerned about. Time for her to retire, as well as for McConnell to retire, among others.

[–]Jesus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

It's just distractions after distractions in US corp land.