you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (6 children)

pro-trans is not anti-science. Anti-science is denying: climate change, tobacco safety, vaccine efficacy, evolutionary theory, mask wearing...

[–]No_ 14 insightful - 3 fun14 insightful - 2 fun15 insightful - 3 fun -  (5 children)

Pro trans is as anti science as anti vaccine is.

[–]Airbus320 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

Vaccine fake and gay too

[–]No_ 2 insightful - 6 fun2 insightful - 5 fun3 insightful - 6 fun -  (0 children)

Erf flat

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

No. It isn't. And the issues over trans is more a matter of culture than science.

[–]jet199 4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

Nope. Trans rhetoric actively denies science.

The science says 90% of transwomen have a fetish which they get in adulthood and have brains the same as normal men.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3180619/

Trans rhetoric says they are all born that way and have some kind of internal feminine essence which means they are really women.

[–]No_ 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Yeah, that’s what I’m saying...