you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Chipit[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

You're arguing dishonestly. You're not applying the Principle of Charity and trying to understand the opponent's arguments as per Saidit policy. You're trying to twist my words so you can call me a nazi, which is total SJW language from the Reddit Hate Brigade, to which you belong.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

1) There is nothing dishonest in what I've written here or elsewhere

2) I don't know what 'Principle of Charity' is, and should not have to

3) Yes - "trying to understand the opponent's arguments" (Not really a problem here, nor is there an 'opponent'. This is not a game.)

4) It's a simple comparison between Nazi interests and what you've written. This is not about you, or me.

5) Still don't know or care what an SJW is

6) Also don't know about the Reddit Hate Brigade

7) Try not to take any of this personally. Stick to the facts or the debate. Focusing on insults is of course a weakness and doesn't help your argument. Cheer up.

[–]Chipit[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

2) I don't know what 'Principle of Charity' is, and should not have to

So you're uneducated.

5) Still don't know or care what an SJW is

Social Justice Warrior. I.E., you, but you already knew that. More dishonesty.

6) Also don't know about the Reddit Hate Brigade

More lies. You've come here from Reddit to spread hate on this website. It's not a secret.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Does it help you to make up categories for people? Does this make you feel better? None of what you mention above is true, or even logically accurate, but you seem to insist that you already know me so well.

For example:

2) An educated person does not have to know your specific use of Principle of Charity. One can for example think of early 17th century concepts in Italy, or Spain, or similar.

5) Look up I.E., and I do not have to know what SJW is. It's unimportant, and irrelevant. I'm also not that social, that concerned with justice on Saidit, or a 'warrior', whatever you think that is.

6) You can read in my comment history that I am not on Saidit to spread hate. Another factual error from you.

What's happened here is that you've tried to identify me, and you want to argue about facts. Both of these approaches are really stupid and unproductive.