The Left is Now the Right: We laughed at the Republican busybody who couldn't joke, declared war on dirty paintings, and peered through your bedroom window. Now that person has switched sides, and nobody's laughing

submitted by quipu from (taibbi.substack.com)

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]VirgilGriff 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

You use a term "cultural Marxism" and don't understand that this very term exists to distinguish it from actual marxism? Do you think people add 'cultural' just for fun or something?

I explained the difference, and therefore explained how they're nearly identical. Instead of class struggle you define your oppressor and victim groups via identity politics and intersectionality. I acknowledged the slight differences and it changes nothing in my argument (and hence why I didn't elaborate in the first place).

Soviets didn't "replace religion" with anything, they just separated the church from state.

Fucking lying communist piece of shit. Get thrown in the Gulags. The Soviets gave tenners to religious adherents who wouldn't renounce the church. There were entire attempted revolutions fought over this, especially among devout old women. The bolsheviks required that everyone accept the supremacy of the prole dictatoriship, renounce religion (and especially religious authority), and dissolve any community worship. Those that refused were literally tortured, murdered, and worked to death.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Persecution_of_Christians_in_the_Soviet_Union

https://archive.org/stream/AleksandrSolzhenitsynTheGulagArchipelago/Aleksandr_Solzhenitsyn_The_Gulag_Archipelago_djvu.txt

[–]flugegeheimen 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Instead of class struggle you define your oppressor and victim groups via identity politics and intersectionality.

Yes, so cultural marxism and classic marxism are two different things and you can't attribute whatever victim numbers you made up for latter to former, which was your argument initially. And they aren't equivalent which was your another argument.

Fucking lying communist piece of shit.

You are projecting about "fucking lying piece of shit" and simply wrong on "communist" part.

The Soviets gave tenners

Ten dollar bills? Anyway you are conflating murdering and blablahblah religious adherents and persecuting for being religious adherents. No one really gave shit about "renouncing the church" in gulag, a lot of remaining church members just happened to support the old regime (which is understandable, considering that the church was separated from the state and lost immense privileges) and that's what they were persecuted for.

"The revolutions of old devout women" is such a hilarious shit I can't really tell whether you butchered real facts out of ignorance or just completely made it up from own drunken ravings.

The bolsheviks required that everyone accept the supremacy of the prole dictatoriship, renounce religion

They didn't require everyone to renounce religion (taking about "fucking lying piece of shit"), and the church existed in USSR until the collapse of latter.

Edit: I just realized that you successfully moved the conversation to whatever problems of your education you are trying to patch up with Wikipedia, while actual point "Soviets didn't "replace religion" with anything" was unaddressed. Shame on me, I guess.

[–]VirgilGriff 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Ten dollar bills?

Thanks for demonstrating you don't know the first fucking thing about this