you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]rightykiller 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (37 children)

i disagree, we have the truth on our side, not lies, misinformation and hate, its been proven that religious fundamentalism causes brain damage, and right wingers are FAR more likely to believe in fake news, and facebook complained that if they took down fake news, that would disproportionately affect the right wing

[–]JasonCarswellVoluntaryist 6 insightful - 4 fun6 insightful - 3 fun7 insightful - 4 fun -  (36 children)

You do the left no favours by using poor grammar, no punctuation, and lacking refuting citations.

Opinions are like assholes, everyone has one. Yours isn't special without proper seduction.

I want more voices on SaidIt refuting all the brainwashed anti-"commie" shit, but your's is not good nor helpful.

Shape up or shut up or keep firing off nonsense to the right that doesn't help your cause.

Also, FYI, the left and right are bullshit dellusions to control the masses with the Hegelian dialectic.

[–]rightykiller 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (35 children)

i agree, im a centrist but the right is full of more shit that the left

[–]Penelope 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (29 children)

I have a hard time believing "Rightykiller" is a centrist. Please provide some examples to support your statement that the right is full of shit.

[–]rightykiller 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (28 children)

they believe lies, no matter how any times their crap is debunked somehow it makes it more true, whenever someone on the left does something bad yall just ignore it or claim they dont represent you, but when someone on the left does something bad you claim "see the left is bad", most stances that the right holds is "because da bibul sez so" like the hate on gays, and abortion (even tho the bible endorses abortion in numbers 5; 11-31)

[–]RickC-137[S] 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

Muh feel feels tell you so. No proof or examples of anything.

[–]rightykiller 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

she presents NO evidence, yet gets angry at me for providing evidence and calls it "not peer reviewed"

[–]rightykiller 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

yawn

[–]RickC-137[S] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Don't you deserve to be honest with yourself?

[–]Penelope 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (21 children)

You have still not presented anything concrete for proof. Everything you've said is simply opinion. You are inadvertently starting to prove OP's post.

Also, that was a feeble attempt at interpreting the Old Testament and is very telling of your overall mental state. The Numbers reference no where mentions that the woman was pregnant. Interpreting ancient manuscripts can lead to many different conclusions....if you ever looked into those things. Besides, the Bible is not an exclusive right wing thing anyway.

[–]rightykiller 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (20 children)

look at this entire website, you guys NEED your own escape from reality, "that was a feeble attempt at interpreting the Old Testament and is very telling of your overall mental state. The Numbers reference no where mentions that the woman was pregnant" read it "21 here the priest is to put the woman under this curse—“may the Lord cause you to become a curse[b] among your people when he makes your womb miscarry and your abdomen swell. 22 May this water that brings a curse enter your body so that your abdomen swells or your womb miscarries.”" womb miscarries, what does that mean to you?

[–]Penelope 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (19 children)

You are quoting the newer interpretation from the NIV version of the Bible which was a more colloquial translation of the original text of the King James version of the Bible which is seen to be the authority over the NIV. If you will now open your King James version, you will notice that the passage you quote nowhere says anything about pregnancy, but instead is referring to whether the wife was adulterous.

I'm not a Bible promoter, and this is pretty low energy effort on your part. You should know this stuff before you state your opinions.

[–]rightykiller 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (18 children)

LOL very convenient, make a million interpretations, thats why the bible is flawed, whos to say what bible is the REAL one?

[–]jamesK_3rd 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

Everyone worships.

You might try to objectively think about why you attack and defend with such fervor instead of refuting the content or their points.

https://files.catbox.moe/gfvza2.jpg

[–]Penelope 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (15 children)

If you study ancient manuscripts you would realize that many things get lost in translation. And perhaps there are many removed parts that are not included in what we call the Bible.

Though you have sidetracked your original premise by pontificating on how you think the Christian God endorses Infanticide. You have neglected to support your premise that Right wing people are more prone to be full of "shit". Like most people, some are, some are not. Through experience I've found left leaning people tend to have a more dubious grasp on reality.

For example, we learned via the Covid scare that it only recognizes two genders. Where is the outrage toward this shameless patriarchal misgendering virus?

[–]JasonCarswellVoluntaryist 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

This is not an exclusive club. Everyone does it. Including you, without proving anything with citations.

[–]rightykiller 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

ive shared at least 2 links, pepe hasnt shared anything

[–]JasonCarswellVoluntaryist 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (4 children)

Used to be. Now both extremes are extremely insane as well as more totalitarian than ever.

[–]rightykiller 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

i guess i cant disagree with that, i show 20 links...they claim its fake news or isnt peer reviewed, penelope is clearly angry with me yet wont leave me alone

[–]Penelope 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

You're point was that Right leaning people are more full of shit. I stated that in your own words to bring concrete proof of this. Instead you spammed debatable links from questionable sites such as Salon and Snopes and some other obscure sites.

I cited the common left leaning viewpoint that there are more than two genders to proffer that the left tends to believe in dubious claims more often than not.

You don't understand what peer reviewed means and you have still failed to grasp the importance of refraining from Tu Qoque to attempt to advance your argument.

You can't let others do your thinking for you. Citing a credible source can help your point but spamming walls of links thinking it's going to solidify your stance is lazy at least and paints the picture that you're incapable of critical thinking.

[–]JasonCarswellVoluntaryist 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Some folks you need to ignore to remain sane.

Some folks often have excellent points worth learning from, whether you align with them or not.

The wisdom is knowing the difference.