White Liberals More Likely To Be Mentally Ill And Depressed - Now be honest with yourself

submitted by RickC-137 from (informationliberation.com)

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]rightykiller 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (20 children)

look at this entire website, you guys NEED your own escape from reality, "that was a feeble attempt at interpreting the Old Testament and is very telling of your overall mental state. The Numbers reference no where mentions that the woman was pregnant" read it "21 here the priest is to put the woman under this curse—“may the Lord cause you to become a curse[b] among your people when he makes your womb miscarry and your abdomen swell. 22 May this water that brings a curse enter your body so that your abdomen swells or your womb miscarries.”" womb miscarries, what does that mean to you?

[–]Penelope 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (19 children)

You are quoting the newer interpretation from the NIV version of the Bible which was a more colloquial translation of the original text of the King James version of the Bible which is seen to be the authority over the NIV. If you will now open your King James version, you will notice that the passage you quote nowhere says anything about pregnancy, but instead is referring to whether the wife was adulterous.

I'm not a Bible promoter, and this is pretty low energy effort on your part. You should know this stuff before you state your opinions.

[–]rightykiller 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (18 children)

LOL very convenient, make a million interpretations, thats why the bible is flawed, whos to say what bible is the REAL one?

[–]jamesK_3rd 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

Everyone worships.

You might try to objectively think about why you attack and defend with such fervor instead of refuting the content or their points.

https://files.catbox.moe/gfvza2.jpg

[–]rightykiller 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

what do you think i worship?

[–]Penelope 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (15 children)

If you study ancient manuscripts you would realize that many things get lost in translation. And perhaps there are many removed parts that are not included in what we call the Bible.

Though you have sidetracked your original premise by pontificating on how you think the Christian God endorses Infanticide. You have neglected to support your premise that Right wing people are more prone to be full of "shit". Like most people, some are, some are not. Through experience I've found left leaning people tend to have a more dubious grasp on reality.

For example, we learned via the Covid scare that it only recognizes two genders. Where is the outrage toward this shameless patriarchal misgendering virus?

[–]rightykiller 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (14 children)

"Like most people, some are, some are not. Through experience I've found left leaning people tend to have a more dubious grasp on reality" funny i found the opposite.

"we learned via the Covid scare that it only recognizes two genders. Where is the outrage toward this shameless patriarchal misgendering virus?" theres only 2 genders pal

[–]Penelope 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (13 children)

You're not very invested in your moniker as a rightykiller by stating that there's only two genders. Most left leaning people I know are at least empathetic to the idea. That was given as an example of people having a dubious grasp on reality.

What are your clear and concise, undisputed examples of the right having a dubious grasp...at least on average...Also no need for bringing up unsubstantiated editorialized opinions....again.

[–]rightykiller 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (9 children)

https://www.salon.com/2019/01/08/a-link-between-brain-damage-and-religious-fundamentalism-has-now-been-established-by-scientists_partner/

https://www.sciencealert.com/damage-to-a-specific-part-of-the-brain-could-result-in-religious-fundamentalism

https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/religious-experiences-shrink-part-of-brain/

https://www.psychologytoday.com/ca/blog/mind-in-the-machine/201810/how-religious-fundamentalism-hijacks-the-brain

https://thehill.com/policy/technology/483890-facebook-exec-in-2016-warned-taking-down-misinformation-would

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ufYgaS9HqPM

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2Uii_M3pgYg

let me guess, fake news...

[–]Penelope 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (8 children)

You do realize that everything you posted is not peer reviewed or in any way commonly accepted as fact? I could post studies showing the opposite of what you're trying to say in regards to liberals. Let me clue you in: All these are designed to provide weak ammo to keep right and left fighting each other by attempting to dehumanize their perceived opponents. Agitprop. This is probably the most accurate study on right-left brain differences: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3092984/ And it is not brain damage or mental deficiency in either.

Interesting course you would take to think spamming links is any type of replacement for defending your premise. Low quality effort again. Please provide proof of your earlier statement. Spare us the Tu Qoque fallacy this time.

[–]rightykiller 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

oh wow great debunking Sherlok NOT!!!, PS it is peer reviewed you are just ignorant,we dont have to de-humanise the right, they arent human, PS it IS a mental deficiency PS you still havent provided any evidence for your claim, so good day

[–]Penelope 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (6 children)

Quite a big opinion you have there. I'm sorry but you have proven the whole point of OP's post...You were asked for solid state proof of what you originally asserted and you ultimately resorted to Ad Hominem as your defense. I think you have made the results of this experiment abundantly clear. Thanks for playing, better luck next time.

[–]rightykiller 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

but there IS ONLY 2 genders, prove me wrong

[–]Penelope 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

I'm not disagreeing with you. It appears you're now avoiding the question I posed to you and are attempting to start an unrelated parallel argument. Please prove your statement or "tap out" before you start stumbling through the minefield of rhetorical fallacies that you're considering crossing.

[–]rightykiller 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

i just did, and PS you didnt send proof of your claim