all 1 comments

[–]SoCo[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

AP's title is dishonest. They also dishonestly frame the quote in the body of the article.

The University of Pennsylvania covered up for Jerry Sandusky's pedo problems for many years. The journalists suggested that the University of Pennsylvania similarly covered up for the Climate Fraud's manipulated data after the Climategate leak exposed him for heavily manipulating the data. Then one blogger took that farther, calling him the Sandusky of Climate Change. This court blames journalists and data analysis's for the blog post's hyperbole. Being a public figure, the Climate Fraud, has no real protection about reports interpreting factual data, as this case is about. This case is a just another nail in the coffin of US's, once, free press and doomed free speech.

Several reviews of the "hockey stick chart" methods and data found it to be dishonest, fraudulent, and not standard scientific practice. The University of Pennsylvania's internal investigation, as well as other organizations invested in the climate hoax, found it to be prefect and nothing wrong.

Most of the controversy from the chart, is that the Climate Fraud refuses to release the data. This prevent actual real review. He may have thought it was accurate in the beginning, but leaked communications showed that he willfully and knowingly manipulated the data over time to try to maintain the original striking rise, which gives the chart its name, as new and more data was accumulated about past climate temperatures.

He couldn't just let better new data flatten his chart, putting it in the history books as an exaggerated reaction to poorly put together interpretation of lacking data.

Unfortunately, the DC court system is fully broken and overtly political. Jury pools in DC are feared as the most ridiculous brainwashed suckers. DC court judges are feared for being political attack dogs, whom have recently completely disregarded regular criminal justice procedure to rail-road trial after trial of political interest, like this one.

There is a reason why every DC court ruling is appealed on due process issues...

In this case, large corrupted billion dollar black-hole nonprofits have manipulated every aspect of the situation with a flood of money, ensuring no fair trail can be had. The Union of Concerned Scientists has turned into the Church of Climate Wealth Redistribution.