all 7 comments

[–]MagicMike 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

Well, they’re criminals so getting rid of evidence is expected.

[–]Questionable[S] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

You mean the committee members right?

[–]ActuallyNot 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

What bollocks.

The GOP shut down the jan 6 committee so rapidly to protect their criminal trump that it did not have the opportunity to properly archive sensitive materials because it was dissolved before the completion of an executive branch review of information that could be damaging to witnesses if released.

Now they're trying to claim that such data indicate that they're trying to hide something?

Bullshit. If your'e interested in the findings of the committee, don't shut it down. If the identities of people have to be protected from the public, and from Trump whose MO is witness intimidation and interference, you should let the decisions be made about who needs protection.

This is the guilty GOP trying to spin their guilt onto their opposition. Again.

Thompson has insisted the January 6 Committee was “was not obligated” to archive all video recordings of transcribed interviews or depositions, but he conceded the panel “did not have the opportunity to properly archive” certain sensitive materials because it was dissolved before the completion of an executive branch review of information that could be damaging to witnesses if released.

[–]WoodyWoodPecker 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

BLEACHBIT JUST LIKE HILLARY CLINTON'S EMAILS.

[–]Questionable[S] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

[–]twolanterns 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

destroying evidence is a crime

dems going down with exposure of their treason