all 8 comments

[–]SoCo 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

A much better done, much larger, and damningly prestigious retro study of blood showed the vaccine spike protein staying in the blood, observed for up to nearly 4 months. They could easily distinguish the vaccine spike proteins from natural ones.

Between this and the recent study about physiologic changes to your heart from spike proteins (either vaccines or covid), shows we are likely in for a bad few years of people dying from heart failure.

Medical people with heart medication and procedure products are scrambling to position themselves to get rich.

[–]Musky[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Iirc it was 9 months rather than 4.

Interestingly my father's cardiologist actually said he doesn't know the shot is worth getting. I know that's a mild statement but it's huge for a doctor to admit to considering the backlash they can experience.

[–]SoCo 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Here's the study I was referring to. I remembered incorrectly, they record detection up to 187 days, with the general mean of 133 days, so slightly longer than 6 months in this study.

(15 August 2023) Detection of recombinant Spike protein in the blood of individuals vaccinated against SARS-CoV-2: Possible molecular mechanisms

DOI: 10.1002/prca.202300048

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/prca.202300048

[–]iamonlyoneman 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

The first comment is all anyone needs for this:

Hang on, so you are assuming the natural clearance rate is 0 based on a sample size of less than 40 people? Oosh! And you are also basing this on the presence of the nucleocapsid. The Nucleocapsid protein is pretty basic, and they did not purify this protein out of the cell. They just detected is with a polyclonal antibody!

Your interpretation of this data is pretty extreme.

[–]Musky[S] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

Antidepressants were approved for use because of studies with sample sizes of as low as 22, but yeah the second part is questionable. I honestly don't know enough about that to have a well informed opinion of it.

[–]iamonlyoneman 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

That's not an argument for supporting this study, it's an argument in favor of disbanding the Food and Drug Administration and shooting all its board members for murder.

[–]Musky[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

They deserve a trial before they're shot, to make everything nice and legal.

[–]iamonlyoneman 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

but of course!

so let's ask the mob of people with pitchforks and torches to hold off until the trial.