Even the CDC Now Admits That the Vaccinated Likely Have a Higher Risk of Infection With New Covid Variant

submitted by AXXA from (thegatewaypundit.com)

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]BobOki 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

So you are not even reading what I typed. Last I checked hypothesis is not absolutes. If you are going to reply, at least have the common decency to read what you are applying to.

[–]cunninglingus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

You wrote: "Scientific orgs DO NOT use words like "may" "likely" "possibly" "some" and "could."

Then you wrote: "No it is not. No science based org would EVER not even a theory as a fact, especially when they are giving guidelines to others about their health and in many cases lives."

This second assumption is a new topic regarding theory. That't not at issue. This is the issue: "Nearly all the U.S. population has antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 from vaccination, previous infection, or both, and it is likely that these antibodies will continue to provide some protection against severe disease from this variant." This is a factual probability, based on scientific research. It's not a theory.

[–]BobOki 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Now that you have written that, explain to me which part of THEORY = absolute. Explain to me which part of THEORIES are not FACTS = absolutes.

There is no such thing as a factual probability, there are just probabilities, theories, and facts. Now, I know this is hard to understand, three words and they are all kinda close to each other, but I implore you to learn the differences.

Probability - "the extent to which something is probable"

Fact - "a thing that is known or proved to be true"

Theory - "a well-substantiated explanation of an aspect of the natural world that can incorporate laws, hypotheses and facts"

Hypothesis - "a supposition or proposed explanation made on the basis of limited evidence as a starting point for further investigation"

There cannot, by definition, be a "factual probability" as those two things are diametrically opposed. As a theory, that requires a well-substantiated explanation, which currently is something the CDC does NOT have, and at best they have hypothesis, backed by nothing but guesses. I did not see any studies showing that the existing vaccination will protect you from anything, we have proof existing that standard masks do nothing against SARS, and MULTIPLE studies and examples of places that did not wear masks or lockdown having substantially less infections as well as deaths, like Sweden.

In summary, everything you said is verifiably incorrect, and the CDC has presented nothing that backs what they are saying, and there are PLENTY of studies showing the opposite. I will not reply to your again on this, I have stated all that needs to be said, and if you are to say something after that then that is just your ego and hubris dripping forward and really I don't care about either of those, but by all means feel free to "get the last word in" because we all know the last word = you won the conversation... ROFL

[–]cunninglingus 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

In summary, everything you said is verifiably incorrect, and the CDC has presented nothing that backs what they are saying, and there are PLENTY of studies showing the opposite.

FALSE - and none of your other points develop an argument against:

Nearly all the U.S. population has antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 from vaccination, previous infection, or both, and it is likely that these antibodies will continue to provide some protection against severe disease from this variant.

This is not a theory. It's obviously a result of verified scientific research and the results of 13 billion COVID vaccine doses that have been administered. Look up examples of scientific research. Saidit has discussed this topic numerous times.