you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]package 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

That doesn't logically follow; a one time donation to the department carries no expectation of additional donations nor does it translate to higher pay for the firefighters. It doesn't "buy" anything other than a more positive public image.

[–]In-the-clouds[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Why then do corporations donate money to politicians? Do you not see how corporations benefit financially from their "donations"? These companies know how to work the world system, until it crashes and burns.

[–]package 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

... because unlike this scenario, there is an expectation or at least a possibility of future donations when companies donate to politicians. In this case the money is essentially a reimbursement for damages for a very specific event that the company was responsible for. While it might make it harder to sue for additional damages, it simply doesn't make sense to suggest that it would motivate people not to testify.