you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]package 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

... because unlike this scenario, there is an expectation or at least a possibility of future donations when companies donate to politicians. In this case the money is essentially a reimbursement for damages for a very specific event that the company was responsible for. While it might make it harder to sue for additional damages, it simply doesn't make sense to suggest that it would motivate people not to testify.