This is very obviously an extremely misleading story; that is not how emergency treatment and medical decisions are made.

Abortion is an issue with no right answer, which makes it such a political manipulation weapon.

Roe v Wade was not overturned by judge's personal feelings about abortion; that's not our our Supreme Court works.

Judges ruled the case was carried out technically wrong. Everyone has know it was technically flawed for decades, including extreme abortion proponents.

Roe v Wade didn't legalize abortion, removing it didn't ban abortion; that's not how law works.

It is criminally illegal for Emergency Rooms not to treat someone for emergency medical problems; this false emotional manipulation is not how ER's work.

Obviously, unborn human children have rights and are not the property of the mother until born; we are not barbarians who allow human property to be abused, sold, or terminated at the owner's will.

Abortion has nothing to do about a woman's body. Pretending it does, is just a lame logical fallacy propaganda trick.

There are special situations and corner-cases where abortion seems less terrible; these do not invalidate any and all interests in restricting baby killing, that is just another lame logical fallacy propaganda trick.

Roe v Wade simply solidified a few other case precedence together. Those still stand, but may be possible to legally challenge now. That is the only change that overturning the flawed Roe v Wade ruling did.

It still stands that the court is legally obliged to protect the both the mother and the child as a matter of legal precedence.

Pretending it removes the protections of women, is as flawed of an assumption that having it meant unborn human life had no rights or legal protection. Neither extreme end is, or ever was, correct.