you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (19 children)

Oh, really?

LOL

...yep, better to reference actual evidence than the unsupported notion of Pizzagate, which aims to discredit political conspiracies that are worth studying (because right-wing propaganda makes popular the most ridiculous claims so that reasonable conspiracy claims can be attached to the popular, ridiculous claims. One of many examples of suicided people: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deborah_Jeane_Palfrey )

[–][deleted] 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (18 children)

You are so incredibly bothersome. You cherry pick things and ignore the crimes of the left.

Fucking hell, both sides are complicit.

[–]JasonCarswell 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

^

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (16 children)

both sides are complicit

They are. I'm not arguing with you, but with the Pizzagate nonsense. Politicians on the left and right wanted Palfrey and two others dead, which is why I mention it.

[–][deleted] 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (15 children)

You didn't answer my question concerning pizzagate. What do you think happened?

Are the Podestas and Alefantis good guys in your worldview? Was that all just a GOP lie? I'm not arguing with you concerning Palfrey. We arent talking about that case though. We are talking about Pizzagate.

That whole term, Pizzagate, it's a term used to discredit the whole shebang. If you don't recall, it segwayed right into the "Me Too" movement and it revitalized media attention on the whole Hollywood pedophilia issue. People moved away from political pedos to Hollywood pedos. That shift was done on purpose and through the manipulation of the initial Pizzagate story.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (14 children)

I think I did answer your question, at least partially: I've not seen any reliable evidence for Pizzagate. Moreover, one doesn't have to bother with unsupported claims when there are many valid conspiracies to study. Hell, if you know the dark web, you can find absolutely horrifying material online. Pizzagate is a propaganda distraction.

[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (13 children)

You just obfuscated the point. There is more going on with the Pizzagate story than "propaganda distraction" although that was undoubtedly happening as well.

Answer my question concerning the Podestas and Alefantis.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (12 children)

Answer my question concerning the Podestas and Alefantis.

Why?

[–][deleted]  (11 children)

[removed]

    [–][deleted] 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (7 children)

    Why risk your account for socks? There's more than one STAB around here. Being a STAB is not against the rules. Harassment and low pyramid comments are against the rules. How quickly you've reminded me that I fucking hate being admin here. I will push that button, don't make me.

    [–]Node 4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 3 fun -  (4 children)

    Thanks for all you do around here. IMO, best saidit admin ever. (possibly because it hasn't quite driven you over the edge yet.)

    Anyway, it's not a totally thankless job... even if it mostly is.

    [–]JasonCarswell 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

    I was explaining - I wasn't name-calling, stalking, or harassing. I've seen more than enough of socks around since I've been back. If I wanted to I could have said something then. I was reading the comments, and it lead here. It wasn't on the main page of the post. Maybe this was unnecessary, but so is all of the bullshit and timesuck that comes from socks. Socks can block me at any time too. Lastly, I would argue that I was not low pyramid I was directly addressing the issue.

    Out of respect for you and the tranquility of SaidIt, I'll refrain from further interactions with socks at least until this is properly discussed in my promised forthcoming "Shills, Semantics, Pejoratives, Debates, Discussions, and Ethics in Social Media Moderating" post where I can lay out in detail some things we all need to discuss, not just for SaidIt but also for the other forums.

    Sorry I upset you. It was not my intention.

    [–][deleted] 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

    I censored this comment. Please do not talk to socks at all. Don't make me write new code to force block you two.

    [–][deleted]  (1 child)

    [deleted]

      [–][deleted] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

      Don't ask him questions, that means you are requesting interaction.